Managing the Coronavirus Pandemic in Switzerland

Eva Maria Belser
{"title":"Managing the Coronavirus Pandemic in Switzerland","authors":"Eva Maria Belser","doi":"10.4324/9781003166771-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the institutional and legal framework of Switzerland’s pandemic management, demonstrating that the cantons were the first to react to the pandemic but were disempowered when the national emergency regime unfolded and transformed the cantons into mere implementation agencies. Two parallel emergency regimes set the framework for the country’s response and provided the federal executive with unprecedented powers: the Federal Epidemics Act empowered the Federal Council to enact health-related measures and constitutional emergency powers authorised it to adopt economic support measures. While the federal system was placed in emergency mode with ease, it proved unprepared to deal with a protracted emergency. When the Federal Council and the cantons started to share the responsibility of dealing with the emergency - and both remained inactive for too long - numerous legislative and institutional shortcomings became obvious. Most importantly, the federal intergovernmental relations were insufficiently equipped to operate in an emergency mode. © 2022 selection and editorial matter, Nico Steytler.","PeriodicalId":130880,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Federalism and Covid-19","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Federalism and Covid-19","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003166771-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This chapter examines the institutional and legal framework of Switzerland’s pandemic management, demonstrating that the cantons were the first to react to the pandemic but were disempowered when the national emergency regime unfolded and transformed the cantons into mere implementation agencies. Two parallel emergency regimes set the framework for the country’s response and provided the federal executive with unprecedented powers: the Federal Epidemics Act empowered the Federal Council to enact health-related measures and constitutional emergency powers authorised it to adopt economic support measures. While the federal system was placed in emergency mode with ease, it proved unprepared to deal with a protracted emergency. When the Federal Council and the cantons started to share the responsibility of dealing with the emergency - and both remained inactive for too long - numerous legislative and institutional shortcomings became obvious. Most importantly, the federal intergovernmental relations were insufficiently equipped to operate in an emergency mode. © 2022 selection and editorial matter, Nico Steytler.
管理瑞士的冠状病毒大流行
本章审查了瑞士大流行病管理的体制和法律框架,表明各州是第一个对大流行病作出反应的,但在国家紧急制度展开并将各州转变为纯粹的执行机构时,各州被剥夺了权力。两个平行的紧急状态制度为该国的应对制定了框架,并为联邦行政部门提供了前所未有的权力:《联邦流行病法》授权联邦委员会颁布与健康有关的措施,宪法紧急状态权力授权联邦委员会采取经济支助措施。虽然联邦系统被轻松地置于紧急状态,但事实证明,它没有准备好应对旷日持久的紧急情况。当联邦委员会和各州开始分担处理紧急情况的责任时(两者都长期不作为),许多立法和体制上的缺陷就变得明显起来。最重要的是,联邦政府间关系不足以在紧急情况下运作。©2022选择和编辑事项,Nico Steytler。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信