{"title":"On the Value Approach to the Description of the Newest German-language Literature","authors":"D. Chugunov","doi":"10.35785/2072-9464-2022-58-2-46-59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article expresses a hypothesis about the need to search for criteria for describing the latest literary process. An assessment of the literary history of Germany after 1945 shows that the situation of the turning point (1990s), which divided the post-war and after the post-war literature, at the beginning of the 21st century, began to transform into something else, to the description of which the \napproaches have to be determined. \nIn the context of human civilization entering into the era of a new understanding of oneself in general and of the individual in particular, retrospective use of the terms «literary direction», «style» or «literary period» does not work. As a possible way, the author of the article proposes a value approach, as one of \nthe criteria – an appeal to the Christian component of modern texts. Thus, fiction \nis understood as a sensitive seismograph reflecting the spiritual quest and de- \nmands of the society in the era of civilizational transformations. \nHighlighting key value characteristics in literary texts allows us to show \nthe search for a way out of postmodern indifference to the world, the change in \nthe playful ambivalence of creativity by the expression of the author’s unambigu- \nous moral position. Comparison of individual works of E. Heidenreich, D. Dörrie, B. Schlink, W. Hilbig, T. Dückers, J. Winkler, S. Lewicharoff, using the theses of K. Jaspers and J. Habermas helps us to represent the actual significance of the stated criterion for describing a modern literary history.","PeriodicalId":211127,"journal":{"name":"Izvestia of Smolensk State University","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestia of Smolensk State University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35785/2072-9464-2022-58-2-46-59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article expresses a hypothesis about the need to search for criteria for describing the latest literary process. An assessment of the literary history of Germany after 1945 shows that the situation of the turning point (1990s), which divided the post-war and after the post-war literature, at the beginning of the 21st century, began to transform into something else, to the description of which the
approaches have to be determined.
In the context of human civilization entering into the era of a new understanding of oneself in general and of the individual in particular, retrospective use of the terms «literary direction», «style» or «literary period» does not work. As a possible way, the author of the article proposes a value approach, as one of
the criteria – an appeal to the Christian component of modern texts. Thus, fiction
is understood as a sensitive seismograph reflecting the spiritual quest and de-
mands of the society in the era of civilizational transformations.
Highlighting key value characteristics in literary texts allows us to show
the search for a way out of postmodern indifference to the world, the change in
the playful ambivalence of creativity by the expression of the author’s unambigu-
ous moral position. Comparison of individual works of E. Heidenreich, D. Dörrie, B. Schlink, W. Hilbig, T. Dückers, J. Winkler, S. Lewicharoff, using the theses of K. Jaspers and J. Habermas helps us to represent the actual significance of the stated criterion for describing a modern literary history.
这篇文章提出了一个假设,即需要寻找描述最新文学过程的标准。对1945年后德国文学史的评估表明,在21世纪初,划分战后和战后文学的转折点(90年代)的情况开始转变为其他东西,对其描述的方法必须确定。在人类文明进入对自身,特别是对个人的新认识时代的背景下,回顾性地使用“文学方向”、“风格”或“文学时期”等术语是行不通的。作为一种可能的途径,本文作者提出了一种价值取向,作为评判标准之一——诉诸现代文本的基督教成分。因此,小说被理解为一个敏感的地震仪,反映了文明转型时代社会的精神追求和需求。突出文学文本的关键价值特征,使我们能够通过表达作者明确的道德立场来展示对后现代冷漠世界的出路的探索,以及创造性的俏皮矛盾心理的变化。比较E. Heidenreich, D. Dörrie, B. Schlink, W. Hilbig, T. d克斯,J. Winkler, S. Lewicharoff的个别作品,利用K. Jaspers和J. Habermas的论点,有助于我们代表所述标准对描述现代文学史的实际意义。