A theoretical framework for evaluating government open data platform

Pin-Yu Chu, Hsien-Lee Tseng
{"title":"A theoretical framework for evaluating government open data platform","authors":"Pin-Yu Chu, Hsien-Lee Tseng","doi":"10.1145/3014087.3014099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regarding Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in the public sector, electronic governance is the first emerged concept which has been recognized as an important issue in government's outreach to citizens since the early 1990s. The most important development of e-governance recently is Open Government Data, which provides citizens with the opportunity to freely access government data, conduct value-added applications, provide creative public services, and participate in different kinds of democratic processes. Open Government Data is expected to enhance the quality and efficiency of government services, strengthen democratic participation, and create interests for the public and enterprises. The success of Open Government Data hinges on its accessibility, quality of data, security policy, and platform functions in general. This article presents a robust assessment framework that not only provides a valuable understanding of the development of Open Government Data but also provides an effective feedback mechanism for mid-course corrections. We further apply the framework to evaluate the Open Government Data platform of the central government, on which open data of nine major government agencies are analyzed. Our research results indicate that Financial Supervisory Commission performs better than other agencies; especially in terms of the accessibility. Financial Supervisory Commission mostly provides 3-star or above dataset formats, and the quality of its metadata is well established. However, most of the data released by government agencies are regulations, reports, operations and other administrative data, which are not immediately applicable. Overall, government agencies should enhance the amount and quality of Open Government Data positively and continuously, also strengthen the functions of discussion and linkage of platforms and the quality of datasets. Aside from consolidating collaborations and interactions to open data communities, government agencies should improve the awareness and ability of personnel to manage and apply open data. With the improvement of the level of acceptance of open data among personnel, the quantity and quality of Open Government Data would enhance as well.","PeriodicalId":224566,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3014087.3014099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Regarding Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in the public sector, electronic governance is the first emerged concept which has been recognized as an important issue in government's outreach to citizens since the early 1990s. The most important development of e-governance recently is Open Government Data, which provides citizens with the opportunity to freely access government data, conduct value-added applications, provide creative public services, and participate in different kinds of democratic processes. Open Government Data is expected to enhance the quality and efficiency of government services, strengthen democratic participation, and create interests for the public and enterprises. The success of Open Government Data hinges on its accessibility, quality of data, security policy, and platform functions in general. This article presents a robust assessment framework that not only provides a valuable understanding of the development of Open Government Data but also provides an effective feedback mechanism for mid-course corrections. We further apply the framework to evaluate the Open Government Data platform of the central government, on which open data of nine major government agencies are analyzed. Our research results indicate that Financial Supervisory Commission performs better than other agencies; especially in terms of the accessibility. Financial Supervisory Commission mostly provides 3-star or above dataset formats, and the quality of its metadata is well established. However, most of the data released by government agencies are regulations, reports, operations and other administrative data, which are not immediately applicable. Overall, government agencies should enhance the amount and quality of Open Government Data positively and continuously, also strengthen the functions of discussion and linkage of platforms and the quality of datasets. Aside from consolidating collaborations and interactions to open data communities, government agencies should improve the awareness and ability of personnel to manage and apply open data. With the improvement of the level of acceptance of open data among personnel, the quantity and quality of Open Government Data would enhance as well.
政府开放数据平台评价的理论框架
关于公共部门的信息和通信技术(ict),电子治理是第一个出现的概念,自20世纪90年代初以来,它一直被认为是政府向公民推广的一个重要问题。最近电子政务最重要的发展是开放政府数据,它为公民提供了自由获取政府数据的机会,进行增值应用,提供创造性的公共服务,并参与各种民主进程。政府开放数据有望提高政府服务的质量和效率,加强民主参与,为公众和企业创造利益。开放政府数据的成功取决于其可访问性、数据质量、安全政策和平台功能。本文提出了一个强大的评估框架,不仅提供了对开放政府数据发展的有价值的理解,而且还提供了一个有效的中期纠正反馈机制。我们进一步应用该框架对中央政府开放数据平台进行评估,在该平台上分析了9个主要政府机构的开放数据。我们的研究结果表明,金融监督管理委员会的绩效优于其他机构;特别是在可访问性方面。金融监督管理委员会提供的数据格式多为三星及以上,其元数据质量已得到很好的验证。然而,政府机构发布的数据大多是法规、报告、运营等行政数据,并非立即适用。总体而言,政府机构应积极、持续地提升政府开放数据的数量和质量,加强平台的讨论联动功能和数据集的质量。除了加强开放数据社区的合作和互动外,政府机构还应提高人员管理和应用开放数据的意识和能力。随着人员对开放数据接受程度的提高,政府开放数据的数量和质量也会随之提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信