Quality Regulation on Two-Sided Platforms: Exclusion, Subsidization, and First-Party Application

Peng Huang, Gaoyan Lyu, Yi Xu
{"title":"Quality Regulation on Two-Sided Platforms: Exclusion, Subsidization, and First-Party Application","authors":"Peng Huang, Gaoyan Lyu, Yi Xu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3738426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Managing the quality of complementary applications is vital to the success of a two-sided platform. While prior research has focused solely on restricting platform access based on a quality threshold, we compare three quality regulation strategies: (1) the platform excludes access to low-quality complementors, (2) it provides a fixed amount of subsidy to high-quality complementors, and (3) it develops its own high-quality applications in addition to those from third-party complementors. Our analyses reveal that the widely adopted exclusion strategy is a special case of the subsidization strategy, and it does not always benefit the platform. In contrast, both subsidization and first-party applications strategies render the platform owner better off, with higher profits, higher average quality, and a larger consumer network, but only subsidization always improves social welfare. In addition, the trade-off between subsidization and first-party applications strategies depends on the development cost of first-party applications and the fraction of high-quality complementors, but the relationship is not monotonic. Our results demonstrate that the platform does not have to sacrifice application quantity for higher application quality. With the right choices, it can profitably improve both measures simultaneously. This research provides concrete guidelines to help platform managers make decisions about regulating the quality of complementary applications. This paper was accepted by Anandhi Bharadwaj, information systems.","PeriodicalId":308400,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Innovation & Public Economics (Topic)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Innovation & Public Economics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3738426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Managing the quality of complementary applications is vital to the success of a two-sided platform. While prior research has focused solely on restricting platform access based on a quality threshold, we compare three quality regulation strategies: (1) the platform excludes access to low-quality complementors, (2) it provides a fixed amount of subsidy to high-quality complementors, and (3) it develops its own high-quality applications in addition to those from third-party complementors. Our analyses reveal that the widely adopted exclusion strategy is a special case of the subsidization strategy, and it does not always benefit the platform. In contrast, both subsidization and first-party applications strategies render the platform owner better off, with higher profits, higher average quality, and a larger consumer network, but only subsidization always improves social welfare. In addition, the trade-off between subsidization and first-party applications strategies depends on the development cost of first-party applications and the fraction of high-quality complementors, but the relationship is not monotonic. Our results demonstrate that the platform does not have to sacrifice application quantity for higher application quality. With the right choices, it can profitably improve both measures simultaneously. This research provides concrete guidelines to help platform managers make decisions about regulating the quality of complementary applications. This paper was accepted by Anandhi Bharadwaj, information systems.
双边平台的质量监管:排除、补贴与第一方应用
管理互补应用程序的质量对于双边平台的成功至关重要。虽然之前的研究只关注基于质量阈值的平台准入限制,但我们比较了三种质量监管策略:(1)平台排除低质量互补商的准入,(2)平台为高质量互补商提供固定数量的补贴,(3)平台除了第三方互补商的应用外,还开发自己的高质量应用。我们的分析表明,广泛采用的排斥策略是补贴策略的一个特例,它并不总是有利于平台。相比之下,无论是补贴还是第一方应用策略,都让平台所有者更富裕,利润更高,平均质量更高,消费者网络更大,但只有补贴总是能提高社会福利。此外,补贴和第一方应用策略之间的权衡取决于第一方应用的开发成本和高质量互补产品的比例,但这种关系不是单调的。我们的结果表明,该平台不必牺牲应用数量来获得更高的应用质量。通过正确的选择,它可以同时有效地改善这两种措施。本研究提供了具体的指导方针,以帮助平台管理人员做出关于规范互补应用程序质量的决策。这篇论文被信息系统的Anandhi Bharadwaj接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信