{"title":"Subrogación convencional y \"despido colectivo de hecho\". Precisiones sobre el régimen jurídico integrador de la subrogación empresarial.","authors":"José Luis Monereo Pérez","doi":"10.55104/rjl_00435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despido colectivo de hecho en el contexto de un cambio de titularidad en contrata o concesión. Cambio de contratista para la vigilancia y seguridad de los centros de acogida a inmigrantes (Canarias), al principio dirigida a los establecimientos hoteleros (gestionados por Cruz Roja) en que se alojaban y finalmente a los centros de acogida preparados al efecto (gestionados por Tragsa). Cuando la empresa entrante viene convencionalmente obligada a asumir a ciertos trabajadores se produce la subrogación empresarial y no cabe invocar la doctrina sobre sucesión de plantillas so pretexto de que ha asumido a menos de la mitad. Aplica doctrina. De acuerdo con el Ministerio Fiscal, desestima recurso frente a STSJ 642/2022 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.\n\n\nCollective dismissal in the context of a change of ownership of a contract or concession. Change of contractor for the surveillance and security of the immigrant reception centers (Canary Islands), initially directed to the hotel establishments (managed by the Red Cross) where they were staying and finally to the reception centers prepared for this purpose (managed by Tragsa). When the incoming company is conventionally obliged to take over certain workers, the company is subrogated and the doctrine of succession of workforces cannot be invoked on the pretext that it has taken over less than half of the workforce. The doctrine applies. In agreement with the Public Prosecutor's Office, dismissed the appeal against STSJ 642/2022 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.","PeriodicalId":291945,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Jurisprudencia Laboral","volume":"276 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Jurisprudencia Laboral","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55104/rjl_00435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despido colectivo de hecho en el contexto de un cambio de titularidad en contrata o concesión. Cambio de contratista para la vigilancia y seguridad de los centros de acogida a inmigrantes (Canarias), al principio dirigida a los establecimientos hoteleros (gestionados por Cruz Roja) en que se alojaban y finalmente a los centros de acogida preparados al efecto (gestionados por Tragsa). Cuando la empresa entrante viene convencionalmente obligada a asumir a ciertos trabajadores se produce la subrogación empresarial y no cabe invocar la doctrina sobre sucesión de plantillas so pretexto de que ha asumido a menos de la mitad. Aplica doctrina. De acuerdo con el Ministerio Fiscal, desestima recurso frente a STSJ 642/2022 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.
Collective dismissal in the context of a change of ownership of a contract or concession. Change of contractor for the surveillance and security of the immigrant reception centers (Canary Islands), initially directed to the hotel establishments (managed by the Red Cross) where they were staying and finally to the reception centers prepared for this purpose (managed by Tragsa). When the incoming company is conventionally obliged to take over certain workers, the company is subrogated and the doctrine of succession of workforces cannot be invoked on the pretext that it has taken over less than half of the workforce. The doctrine applies. In agreement with the Public Prosecutor's Office, dismissed the appeal against STSJ 642/2022 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.
在合同或特许权所有权变更的情况下集体解雇。改变了移民接待中心(加那利群岛)的监督和安全承包商,最初是针对他们居住的酒店设施(由红十字会管理),最后是针对为此目的准备的接待中心(由Tragsa管理)。如果根据协议,新企业有义务接管某些工人,就会发生公司代孕,不能以接管不到一半的劳动力为借口援引劳动力继承原则。适用原则。根据检察官办公室的说法,驳回了对STSJ 642/2022 Las Palmas De Gran Canaria的上诉。在合同或特许权所有权变更的情况下集体辞职。对移民接待中心(加那利群岛)进行监督和安保的承包商变更,最初针对其所在的旅馆设施(由红十字会管理),最后针对为此目的准备的接待中心(由Tragsa管理)。当新入公司按照惯例有义务接管某些工人时,该公司是代位的,不能援引劳动力继承原则,因为它接管的劳动力少于一半。该学说适用。根据与检察官办公室达成的协议,撤销了对STSJ 642/2022 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria的上诉。