Design and development of the income measures in the European Social Surveys

Juergen H. P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, U. Warner
{"title":"Design and development of the income measures in the European Social Surveys","authors":"Juergen H. P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, U. Warner","doi":"10.51936/xbmz9344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In social surveys \"total net household income\" is an indicator of the re-spondent's socio-economic status. It describes the economic situation of household members and their positions in an income distribution. It is used as an explanatory variable in mobility studies and as a social-demographic back-ground item in inequality research. This paper shows the impact of questionnaire design on measurements of \"total net household income\" in social surveys. In particular we illustrate how the measurement quality of the income variable depends on the data sources about the national income distributions used to design the answer categories offered to the respondent. Beginning with the fourth round of European Social Survey fielded in 2008 and the following years, the income categories for the question about the \"total net household income\" amount are built on national income distribution of households resident in the country under study. The response categories of the modified ESS questionnaires have been based on deciles of the actual household income distribution in the country in question. The central organizers of European Social Survey (ESS) instruct the national questionnaire designers to define the income brackets for the answer categories using the deciles of the most reliable national income data source. Analyzing the ESS data from 2008, 2010 and 2012, we found in some countries remarkable divergences from the expected 10% frequencies in each category. In this article we argue that the quality of this new income measure depends on the quality of the reference statistics from which the national household income ranges are derived. The quality of the responses to the survey question about the \"total net household income\", and finally the quality of the obtained survey measure, depends on the quality of the reference statistics from which the household income categories for the answers is derived. These reference data must cover all types of the household's income from all household members and optimally represent the national distribution of household income across the survey universe. That means first that all possible payments accruing to a household and all its members in a given country must be reported in references, and second that all households in the survey's universe must be represented in the statistics used to detect the answer categories. Then the income brackets for the response categories can be calculated using the 10% percentiles from the income distribution in the reference data. Relevance, accuracy, timeliness, comparability, coherence, accessibility and clarity are quality domains of official statistics used as reference data for the survey measurement. We conclude that the central coordinators of the ESS define and communicate minimum threshold values for quality domains of the reference data. The national coordinators should report deviations. This would give the users of ESS data an insight into the quality of the income measurement.","PeriodicalId":242585,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Methodology and Statistics","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Methodology and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51936/xbmz9344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In social surveys "total net household income" is an indicator of the re-spondent's socio-economic status. It describes the economic situation of household members and their positions in an income distribution. It is used as an explanatory variable in mobility studies and as a social-demographic back-ground item in inequality research. This paper shows the impact of questionnaire design on measurements of "total net household income" in social surveys. In particular we illustrate how the measurement quality of the income variable depends on the data sources about the national income distributions used to design the answer categories offered to the respondent. Beginning with the fourth round of European Social Survey fielded in 2008 and the following years, the income categories for the question about the "total net household income" amount are built on national income distribution of households resident in the country under study. The response categories of the modified ESS questionnaires have been based on deciles of the actual household income distribution in the country in question. The central organizers of European Social Survey (ESS) instruct the national questionnaire designers to define the income brackets for the answer categories using the deciles of the most reliable national income data source. Analyzing the ESS data from 2008, 2010 and 2012, we found in some countries remarkable divergences from the expected 10% frequencies in each category. In this article we argue that the quality of this new income measure depends on the quality of the reference statistics from which the national household income ranges are derived. The quality of the responses to the survey question about the "total net household income", and finally the quality of the obtained survey measure, depends on the quality of the reference statistics from which the household income categories for the answers is derived. These reference data must cover all types of the household's income from all household members and optimally represent the national distribution of household income across the survey universe. That means first that all possible payments accruing to a household and all its members in a given country must be reported in references, and second that all households in the survey's universe must be represented in the statistics used to detect the answer categories. Then the income brackets for the response categories can be calculated using the 10% percentiles from the income distribution in the reference data. Relevance, accuracy, timeliness, comparability, coherence, accessibility and clarity are quality domains of official statistics used as reference data for the survey measurement. We conclude that the central coordinators of the ESS define and communicate minimum threshold values for quality domains of the reference data. The national coordinators should report deviations. This would give the users of ESS data an insight into the quality of the income measurement.
欧洲社会调查中收入指标的设计与发展
在社会调查中,“家庭净收入总额”是反映被访者社会经济地位的一个指标。它描述了家庭成员的经济状况及其在收入分配中的地位。它在流动性研究中被用作解释变量,在不平等研究中被用作社会人口背景项目。本文研究问卷设计对社会调查中“家庭净收入总量”测量的影响。我们特别说明了收入变量的测量质量如何取决于用于设计提供给受访者的答案类别的有关国民收入分配的数据源。从2008年及之后几年进行的第四轮欧洲社会调查开始,关于“家庭净收入总额”问题的收入类别是根据被研究国家居民家庭的国民收入分配来确定的。经修订的社会核算系统问题单的答复类别是以有关国家实际家庭收入分配的十分位数为基础的。欧洲社会调查(ESS)的中心组织者指示国家问卷设计者使用最可靠的国民收入数据源的十分位数来定义回答类别的收入等级。分析2008年、2010年和2012年的ESS数据,我们发现一些国家在每个类别中与预期的10%频率存在显著差异。在本文中,我们认为,这种新的收入衡量标准的质量取决于参考统计数据的质量,而参考统计数据是推导出国民家庭收入范围的依据。关于“家庭净收入总额”的调查问题的回答质量,以及最终获得的调查措施的质量,取决于得出答案的家庭收入类别的参考统计数据的质量。这些参考数据必须涵盖所有家庭成员的所有类型的家庭收入,并最佳地代表整个调查范围内家庭收入的全国分布。这意味着首先,必须在参考文献中报告给定国家的一个家庭及其所有成员的所有可能付款,其次,调查范围内的所有家庭必须在用于检测答案类别的统计数据中得到代表。然后,可以使用参考数据中收入分布的10%百分位数来计算响应类别的收入括号。相关性、准确性、及时性、可比性、连贯性、可及性和清晰度是用作调查测量参考数据的官方统计的质量领域。我们得出结论,ESS的中心协调者定义并传达了参考数据质量域的最小阈值。国家协调员应报告偏差。这将使ESS数据的使用者能够深入了解收入计量的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信