Uptake of Modern Family Planning Among Postpartum Women Attending Postnatal Clinic in Busolwe Hospital, Butaleja District, Eastern Uganda

Healthcare Studies Pub Date : 2023-02-16 DOI:10.58612/hs112
Fred Mubale, A. Auma, Raymond Otim, Nelly Atim
{"title":"Uptake of Modern Family Planning Among Postpartum Women Attending Postnatal Clinic in Busolwe Hospital, Butaleja District, Eastern Uganda","authors":"Fred Mubale, A. Auma, Raymond Otim, Nelly Atim","doi":"10.58612/hs112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Family planning (FP) is key to preventing the social, economic and health consequences resulting from unintended pregnancies. Failure to control family size and child spacing has pressing negative effects on the health of women, their children, the community and the nation at large. Despite various family planning interventions such as Uganda Family Planning Costed Implementation Plan (UFPCIP) and Postpartum Family Planning Action Plan (PFAP), the unmet FP need still stagnates as high as 28%. Therefore, this study determined the prevalence and assessed the factors associated with modern family planning uptake among postpartum women attending Postnatal Care (PNC) in Busolwe Hospital, Butaleja district, Uganda. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 361 postpartum mothers attending PNC. Quantitative approach was applied and data collected using pre-tested semi-structured questionnaire. Participants recruited by consecutive sampling. Ethical considerations and approval was sought from Lira University institutional research board (IRB) and data was analyzed using SPSS version 23. Results: A total of 361 participants were recruited for the study. Majority of the participants 167(46.3%) aged between 17-24 years with mean age 26.01 (SD±5.877). Over all 122(34%) was the prevalence of modern FP uptake. Factors independently associated with modern family planning at multivariate analysis were; Education level (P=0.007, OR 0.048, 95% CI 0.005-0.435); occupation (P= 0.039, OR 0.432, 95% CI 0.195-0.958), Income (P=0.000, OR 0.209, 95% CI 0.088-0.494), Side effects (P=0.014, OR 3.062, 95% CI 1.249-7.508), and Perception about many children (P=0.000, OR 0.128, 95% CI 0.049-0.339). Conclusion: The prevalence of modern family planning was low in Butaleja district. This was due to inadequate education among women, unemployment, low-income status, desire for many children and the side effects associated with family planning use.","PeriodicalId":192902,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Studies","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58612/hs112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Family planning (FP) is key to preventing the social, economic and health consequences resulting from unintended pregnancies. Failure to control family size and child spacing has pressing negative effects on the health of women, their children, the community and the nation at large. Despite various family planning interventions such as Uganda Family Planning Costed Implementation Plan (UFPCIP) and Postpartum Family Planning Action Plan (PFAP), the unmet FP need still stagnates as high as 28%. Therefore, this study determined the prevalence and assessed the factors associated with modern family planning uptake among postpartum women attending Postnatal Care (PNC) in Busolwe Hospital, Butaleja district, Uganda. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 361 postpartum mothers attending PNC. Quantitative approach was applied and data collected using pre-tested semi-structured questionnaire. Participants recruited by consecutive sampling. Ethical considerations and approval was sought from Lira University institutional research board (IRB) and data was analyzed using SPSS version 23. Results: A total of 361 participants were recruited for the study. Majority of the participants 167(46.3%) aged between 17-24 years with mean age 26.01 (SD±5.877). Over all 122(34%) was the prevalence of modern FP uptake. Factors independently associated with modern family planning at multivariate analysis were; Education level (P=0.007, OR 0.048, 95% CI 0.005-0.435); occupation (P= 0.039, OR 0.432, 95% CI 0.195-0.958), Income (P=0.000, OR 0.209, 95% CI 0.088-0.494), Side effects (P=0.014, OR 3.062, 95% CI 1.249-7.508), and Perception about many children (P=0.000, OR 0.128, 95% CI 0.049-0.339). Conclusion: The prevalence of modern family planning was low in Butaleja district. This was due to inadequate education among women, unemployment, low-income status, desire for many children and the side effects associated with family planning use.
乌干达东部Butaleja区Busolwe医院产后诊所的产后妇女接受现代计划生育
背景:计划生育是预防意外怀孕造成的社会、经济和健康后果的关键。未能控制家庭规模和生育间隔对妇女及其子女、社区和整个国家的健康产生了紧迫的负面影响。尽管有各种计划生育干预措施,如乌干达计划生育成本实施计划(UFPCIP)和产后计划生育行动计划(PFAP),但未满足的计划生育需求仍然停滞不前,高达28%。因此,本研究确定了在乌干达Butaleja区Busolwe医院接受产后护理(PNC)的产后妇女中现代计划生育的患病率,并评估了与之相关的因素。方法:对361名产后产妇进行横断面研究。采用定量方法,采用预测半结构化问卷收集数据。参与者采用连续抽样方式招募。里拉大学机构研究委员会(IRB)征求了伦理考虑和批准,数据使用SPSS version 23进行分析。结果:研究共招募了361名参与者。167名参与者(46.3%)年龄在17-24岁之间,平均年龄26.01岁(SD±5.877)。在所有122例(34%)中,现代计划生育的患病率。在多变量分析中,与现代计划生育独立相关的因素有;教育程度(P=0.007, OR 0.048, 95% CI 0.005-0.435);职业(P= 0.039, OR 0.432, 95% CI 0.195-0.958)、收入(P=0.000, OR 0.209, 95% CI 0.088-0.494)、副作用(P=0.014, OR 3.062, 95% CI 1.249-7.508)和对多子女的看法(P=0.000, OR 0.128, 95% CI 0.049-0.339)。结论:布塔莱贾地区现代计划生育普及率较低。这是由于妇女受教育不足、失业、低收入、想要许多孩子以及与使用计划生育有关的副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信