Chinese empire or a prototype of responsible global power: discussions on the Great Qing in China and the West

K. Sanin
{"title":"Chinese empire or a prototype of responsible global power: discussions on the Great Qing in China and the West","authors":"K. Sanin","doi":"10.31857/s086919080014533-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the light of China’s rise, it is of great interest to consider the views that are widespread in the PRC on the nature of Chinese state and the proper mode of international relations. Considering that Chinese leadership has proclaimed the goal of \"rejuvenation\" of the Chinese nation, modern assessments of China's historical past allow us to take a fresh look at the prospects for China's internal development as well as Chinese foreign policy in Asia. In this regard the era of the Qing Dynasty is of particular interest. During that period Chinese territory expanded  approximately to its modern borders, and the relations with the neighbors underwent a transition from the tributary system to the modern Westphalian type of international relations.\nThere exist various interpretations of Chinese foreign policy’s traditions. Those interpretations are largely determined by the attitude to China's current behavior at the international stage. While the Chinese rulers have adopted the concept of traditional Chinese world order that is of Western origin, many Western researchers nowadays question this concept and tend to describe pre-revolutionary China as one of many expansionist empires in Eurasia. That point of view is subject to sharp criticism from Chinese authors. The portrayal of Qing China as one of the empires can entail serious consequences for international relations as well as the territorial integrity of the PRC.\nIn order to achieve their goals in domestic and foreign policy, Chinese leaders strive to build a historical narrative in such a way that it combines the elements of various historical periods which are most profitable in the current circumstances, including the history of Silk Road.","PeriodicalId":159294,"journal":{"name":"Vostok. Afro-aziatskie obshchestva: istoriia i sovremennost","volume":"8 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vostok. Afro-aziatskie obshchestva: istoriia i sovremennost","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s086919080014533-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the light of China’s rise, it is of great interest to consider the views that are widespread in the PRC on the nature of Chinese state and the proper mode of international relations. Considering that Chinese leadership has proclaimed the goal of "rejuvenation" of the Chinese nation, modern assessments of China's historical past allow us to take a fresh look at the prospects for China's internal development as well as Chinese foreign policy in Asia. In this regard the era of the Qing Dynasty is of particular interest. During that period Chinese territory expanded  approximately to its modern borders, and the relations with the neighbors underwent a transition from the tributary system to the modern Westphalian type of international relations. There exist various interpretations of Chinese foreign policy’s traditions. Those interpretations are largely determined by the attitude to China's current behavior at the international stage. While the Chinese rulers have adopted the concept of traditional Chinese world order that is of Western origin, many Western researchers nowadays question this concept and tend to describe pre-revolutionary China as one of many expansionist empires in Eurasia. That point of view is subject to sharp criticism from Chinese authors. The portrayal of Qing China as one of the empires can entail serious consequences for international relations as well as the territorial integrity of the PRC. In order to achieve their goals in domestic and foreign policy, Chinese leaders strive to build a historical narrative in such a way that it combines the elements of various historical periods which are most profitable in the current circumstances, including the history of Silk Road.
中华帝国或负责任的全球大国的原型:关于中国和西方大清的讨论
鉴于中国的崛起,考虑在中国广泛存在的关于中国国家性质和国际关系的适当模式的观点是非常有趣的。考虑到中国领导人已经宣布了中华民族“复兴”的目标,对中国历史的现代评估使我们能够重新审视中国内部发展的前景以及中国在亚洲的外交政策。在这方面,清朝的时代是特别有趣的。在这一时期,中国的疆域大致扩展到现代边界,与邻国的关系经历了从朝贡体系到现代威斯特伐利亚式国际关系的过渡。对中国外交政策传统的解读多种多样。这些解读很大程度上取决于对中国目前在国际舞台上行为的态度。虽然中国统治者已经接受了西方起源的传统中国世界秩序的概念,但许多西方研究人员现在质疑这一概念,并倾向于将革命前的中国描述为欧亚大陆众多扩张主义帝国之一。这种观点受到了中国作家的尖锐批评。将清朝描述为帝国之一可能会对国际关系和中华人民共和国的领土完整造成严重后果。为了实现国内和外交政策的目标,中国领导人努力构建一种历史叙事,这种叙事结合了在当前情况下最有利的各个历史时期的元素,包括丝绸之路的历史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信