Freiheit – Gleichheit – Eigentum – Sozialstaat = Kapitalismus

Albert Krölls
{"title":"Freiheit – Gleichheit – Eigentum – Sozialstaat = Kapitalismus","authors":"Albert Krölls","doi":"10.1515/zksp-2016-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As opposed to common conceptions amongst left-wing analysts (most recently Brunkhorst 2014), this article proves that Germany’s Basic Law contains no unutilised potential for emancipation in the direction of a socialist society, but rather necessarily anchors the capitalist reason of state. The topics of this argumentation are the Left’s old and new bearers of hope in constitutional law: freedom and equality of opportunity, the social obligation of private property, the public ownership clause, the state goals of labor and environmental protection, and the principle of the welfare state.","PeriodicalId":250691,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie","volume":"425 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zksp-2016-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As opposed to common conceptions amongst left-wing analysts (most recently Brunkhorst 2014), this article proves that Germany’s Basic Law contains no unutilised potential for emancipation in the direction of a socialist society, but rather necessarily anchors the capitalist reason of state. The topics of this argumentation are the Left’s old and new bearers of hope in constitutional law: freedom and equality of opportunity, the social obligation of private property, the public ownership clause, the state goals of labor and environmental protection, and the principle of the welfare state.
与左翼分析人士(最近的一次是Brunkhorst 2014)的共同观点相反,本文证明了德国的《基本法》在社会主义社会的方向上没有未被利用的解放潜力,而是必然锚定了国家的资本主义理性。这场辩论的主题是左派在宪法中希望的新旧承担者:机会的自由和平等、私有财产的社会义务、公有制条款、劳动和环境保护的国家目标以及福利国家原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信