Mandatory Upstream Inputs and Upward Pricing Pressure: Implications for Competition Policy

T. Tardiff, Dennis L. Weisman
{"title":"Mandatory Upstream Inputs and Upward Pricing Pressure: Implications for Competition Policy","authors":"T. Tardiff, Dennis L. Weisman","doi":"10.1108/S0193-589520180000028008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nThe competition and regulatory economics literature has developed indicators that detect whether a vertically integrated provider (VIP) is engaging in market exclusion in the form of an anticompetitive price squeeze and non-price discrimination leading to sabotage of downstream competitors. Weisman integrates these indicators by developing a safe-harbor range within which a profit-maximizing VIP engages in neither form of market exclusion. Downstream retail competition that depends on the VIP’s inputs imposes upward pricing pressure on the downstream prices, with the amount of such pressure increasing as the downstream products become more homogeneous (closer substitutes). We analyze the implications of upward pricing pressure for antitrust evaluations of a duty to deal, regulatory policies mandating wholesale inputs for entrants, and vertical mergers. We find, for example, no basis to oppose a merger in which the VIP was previously required to supply inputs to rivals at unregulated prices.","PeriodicalId":231580,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Antitrust, Settlements, and the Federal Trade Commission","volume":"390 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Antitrust, Settlements, and the Federal Trade Commission","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0193-589520180000028008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The competition and regulatory economics literature has developed indicators that detect whether a vertically integrated provider (VIP) is engaging in market exclusion in the form of an anticompetitive price squeeze and non-price discrimination leading to sabotage of downstream competitors. Weisman integrates these indicators by developing a safe-harbor range within which a profit-maximizing VIP engages in neither form of market exclusion. Downstream retail competition that depends on the VIP’s inputs imposes upward pricing pressure on the downstream prices, with the amount of such pressure increasing as the downstream products become more homogeneous (closer substitutes). We analyze the implications of upward pricing pressure for antitrust evaluations of a duty to deal, regulatory policies mandating wholesale inputs for entrants, and vertical mergers. We find, for example, no basis to oppose a merger in which the VIP was previously required to supply inputs to rivals at unregulated prices.
强制性上游投入和价格上涨压力:竞争政策的启示
竞争与监管经济学的文献已经开发了一些指标来检测垂直整合供应商(VIP)是否以反竞争的价格挤压和非价格歧视的形式参与市场排斥,从而导致下游竞争者的破坏。Weisman通过建立一个安全港范围来整合这些指标,在这个范围内,利润最大化的VIP不参与任何形式的市场排斥。依赖于VIP投入的下游零售竞争对下游价格施加了上行的定价压力,随着下游产品同质化(更接近替代),这种压力的量也在增加。我们分析了价格上涨压力对交易义务的反垄断评估、强制进入者批发投入的监管政策和垂直合并的影响。例如,我们发现,没有理由反对以前要求VIP以不受监管的价格向竞争对手提供投入的合并。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信