In Search of 'Dialectic' Process Models: From 'Funnel of Causality' to an Integrated Theory of Policy Regimes

Matt Wilder
{"title":"In Search of 'Dialectic' Process Models: From 'Funnel of Causality' to an Integrated Theory of Policy Regimes","authors":"Matt Wilder","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2614531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper surveys how far policy theorizing has come since the ‘funnel of causality’ metaphor popularized in the 1970s by Richard Hofferbert and Richard Simeon. Scholarly attention to institutions, subsystems, networks, and regimes has brought sophistication to early accounts of the impact of structure on policy formulation and outcomes, but arriving at a holistic ‘dialectical’ theory of the policy process has not been without challenges. The literature on policy regimes, having integrated insights from both political economy and theorizing on networks and subsystems, holds promise in moving toward a dialectical theory of the policy process. Deficiencies remain, however, in our understanding of how structures that exist at multiple levels of policymaking condition behaviour. The paper proposes that a focus on ‘policy image dynamics’ across three levels of analysis (micro, meso, and macro) is a viable way to proceed in developing an integrated and dialectic theory of policy regimes.","PeriodicalId":342163,"journal":{"name":"Political Institutions: Bureaucracies & Public Administration eJournal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Institutions: Bureaucracies & Public Administration eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2614531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper surveys how far policy theorizing has come since the ‘funnel of causality’ metaphor popularized in the 1970s by Richard Hofferbert and Richard Simeon. Scholarly attention to institutions, subsystems, networks, and regimes has brought sophistication to early accounts of the impact of structure on policy formulation and outcomes, but arriving at a holistic ‘dialectical’ theory of the policy process has not been without challenges. The literature on policy regimes, having integrated insights from both political economy and theorizing on networks and subsystems, holds promise in moving toward a dialectical theory of the policy process. Deficiencies remain, however, in our understanding of how structures that exist at multiple levels of policymaking condition behaviour. The paper proposes that a focus on ‘policy image dynamics’ across three levels of analysis (micro, meso, and macro) is a viable way to proceed in developing an integrated and dialectic theory of policy regimes.
寻找“辩证法”过程模型:从“因果关系漏斗”到政策制度的综合理论
本文调查了自20世纪70年代由理查德·霍弗伯特和理查德·西蒙推广的“因果关系漏斗”隐喻以来,政策理论化已经走了多远。学术界对制度、子系统、网络和制度的关注,使结构对政策制定和结果的影响的早期描述变得更加复杂,但要达到政策过程的整体“辩证”理论并非没有挑战。有关政策制度的文献综合了政治经济学的见解以及对网络和子系统的理论化,有望朝着政策过程的辩证理论发展。然而,我们对存在于多个决策层面的结构如何影响行为的理解仍然存在不足。本文提出,在三个层面(微观、中观和宏观)分析中关注“政策形象动力学”是一种可行的方法,可以继续发展政策制度的综合辩证法理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信