THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE E-COURT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN SEMARANG COURTS IN SEMARANG CITY

W. Widodo, Toebagus Galang, Sapto Budoyo
{"title":"THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE E-COURT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN SEMARANG COURTS IN SEMARANG CITY","authors":"W. Widodo, Toebagus Galang, Sapto Budoyo","doi":"10.26480/imcs.01.2021.26.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The administration of courts in Indonesia adheres to Article 2 paragraph (4) of Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power where the implementation of the court must be fast, and low cost. In the government’s effort to make this happen, an online court system, known as E-Court, is created in which presents four E-Court features, namely E-Filing, E-Skum, E-Payment and E-Summons. The implementation of the E-court, which is under the auspices of the Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2018, according to the author, is still doubtful because the drastic changes from the previous court service system which were completely offline but now must be done online certainly lead to a separate polemic which is not impossible to actually slow down the course of the court. Based on that the authors intend to conduct a study that examines the effectiveness of E-court. The study was conducted using an empirical juridical approach method, which is descriptive in which the source of research relies on data taken in the field where in this case the authors chose to conduct research in the Semarang City District Court and religious court supported by relevant literature analyzed using triangulation of data to obtain results. The results showed that the implementation of e-Court in Semarang was still not effective as based on the data obtained from 2016-2019 there is no significant increase to the applicant who registered their case. The E-Court still need many improvements including adding the possibility to integrate the e-court system into criminal court. However, before going to achieve that there is but a large task that needs to be completed for the supreme court as an institution which oversees all courts in Indonesia and that is to increase socialization not only for advocates but also court employees and the community as potential users of the application so that the implementation of e-court can run effectively.","PeriodicalId":292564,"journal":{"name":"INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND COMPUTER SCIENCE","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND COMPUTER SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26480/imcs.01.2021.26.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The administration of courts in Indonesia adheres to Article 2 paragraph (4) of Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power where the implementation of the court must be fast, and low cost. In the government’s effort to make this happen, an online court system, known as E-Court, is created in which presents four E-Court features, namely E-Filing, E-Skum, E-Payment and E-Summons. The implementation of the E-court, which is under the auspices of the Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2018, according to the author, is still doubtful because the drastic changes from the previous court service system which were completely offline but now must be done online certainly lead to a separate polemic which is not impossible to actually slow down the course of the court. Based on that the authors intend to conduct a study that examines the effectiveness of E-court. The study was conducted using an empirical juridical approach method, which is descriptive in which the source of research relies on data taken in the field where in this case the authors chose to conduct research in the Semarang City District Court and religious court supported by relevant literature analyzed using triangulation of data to obtain results. The results showed that the implementation of e-Court in Semarang was still not effective as based on the data obtained from 2016-2019 there is no significant increase to the applicant who registered their case. The E-Court still need many improvements including adding the possibility to integrate the e-court system into criminal court. However, before going to achieve that there is but a large task that needs to be completed for the supreme court as an institution which oversees all courts in Indonesia and that is to increase socialization not only for advocates but also court employees and the community as potential users of the application so that the implementation of e-court can run effectively.
三宝垄市三宝垄法院电子法院管理系统的有效性
印度尼西亚法院的行政管理遵循第2(4)号法律第2条。2009年第48号关于司法权的法院执行,其中必须快速,低成本。为了实现这一目标,政府创建了一个名为“电子法庭”的网上法庭系统,其中包含四项电子法庭功能,即电子立案、电子案件、电子支付和电子传票。根据提交人的说法,在最高法院2018年第3号条例的支持下,电子法院的实施仍然值得怀疑,因为以前的法院服务系统完全离线,但现在必须在线完成,这一系统的巨大变化肯定会导致一场单独的争论,这实际上并不是不可能减缓法院的进程。基于此,笔者拟对电子法院的有效性进行研究。本研究采用实证司法方法进行,该方法是描述性的,其中研究来源依赖于该领域的数据,在这种情况下,作者选择在三宝垄市地方法院和宗教法院进行研究,并通过相关文献的支持,使用三角分析法分析数据以获得结果。结果表明,电子法院在三宝垄的实施仍然没有效果,因为根据2016-2019年获得的数据,登记案件的申请人没有显着增加。电子法院还有很多需要改进的地方,包括增加将电子法院系统整合到刑事法院的可能性。然而,在实现这一目标之前,作为监管印尼所有法院的机构,最高法院还有一项重大任务需要完成,那就是不仅要提高维权人士的社会化程度,也要提高法院员工和社区作为应用程序潜在用户的社会化程度,这样电子法院的实施才能有效地进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信