Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices of Poultry Farmers Regarding the Control of Chicken Coccidiosis in Lagos State, Nigeria

Oluwayomi O. Adeyemi, Emmanuel Taiwo Idowu, B. Akinsanya, I. D. Jatau
{"title":"Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices of Poultry Farmers Regarding the Control of Chicken Coccidiosis in Lagos State, Nigeria","authors":"Oluwayomi O. Adeyemi, Emmanuel Taiwo Idowu, B. Akinsanya, I. D. Jatau","doi":"10.36108/pajols/3202/70.0160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Coccidiosis, caused by coccidia of the genus Eimeria, accounts for significant production loss-es in the global poultry industry. This study evaluated commercial poultry farmers’ knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAPs) on chicken coccidiosis and its control in Lagos State, Nigeria.\nMethods: Semi-structured questionnaires assessing KAPs relating to chicken coccidiosis and its control were administered to 157 poultry farmers. Summary statistics were performed on the collated data using the Statis-tical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software. The relationship between respondents’ knowledge and demographic features was analysed using the Chi-square test of independence on SPSS. Results were consid-ered significant at p < 0.05.\nResults: The majority of the respondents were males (91, 58%), married (108, 68.7%), and between 31 and 50 years old (106, 67.5%). Most have had tertiary education (84, 53.5%) and farming experience between 1 and 5 years (97, 61.8%). All the respondents have heard about coccidiosis previously, and of these, 57 (36.3%), 45 (28.7%), and 37 (23.6%) sourced this information from veterinarians, fellow farmers, and during training/workshops, respectively. Ingestion of faecally contaminated feed and water by chickens was opined as the cause of coccidiosis by 48 (30.6%) respondents, followed by bacteria (30, 19.1%) and poor hygiene and sanitation (27, 17.2%). Most mentioned that ingesting faecally contaminated feed and water (126, 80.2%) is the mode of coccidiosis transmission, and 76 (48.4%) identified bloody and watery diarrhea as the major clinical sign. The gender of the farmers and their educational status were significantly associated with the level of coccidiosis knowledge. Of the study participants, 150 (95.5%) have experienced an outbreak of coccidiosis on their farms before, and the majority observed bloody diarrhea (90, 60.0%) as the major clinical sign. None of the farmers used ionophore drugs. Embazin-forte® (Sulphaquinoxaline) was the drug most reportedly used to prevent and treat coccidiosis. Few farmers (11, 7%) adopted anticoccidial vaccines for coccidiosis prevention using either Immucox®, Livacox®, or both.\nConclusion: This study showed that poultry farmers in Lagos State have adequate knowledge of chicken coccidiosis. Chemical anticoccidials were the only drugs used for prevention and treatment, and vaccines were not adopted. There is a need for veterinarians and poultry extension workers to enlighten farmers in the study area about the proper, safe, and effective use of anticoccidial drugs and vaccines.","PeriodicalId":234626,"journal":{"name":"Pan African Journal of Life Sciences","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pan African Journal of Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36108/pajols/3202/70.0160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coccidiosis, caused by coccidia of the genus Eimeria, accounts for significant production loss-es in the global poultry industry. This study evaluated commercial poultry farmers’ knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAPs) on chicken coccidiosis and its control in Lagos State, Nigeria. Methods: Semi-structured questionnaires assessing KAPs relating to chicken coccidiosis and its control were administered to 157 poultry farmers. Summary statistics were performed on the collated data using the Statis-tical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software. The relationship between respondents’ knowledge and demographic features was analysed using the Chi-square test of independence on SPSS. Results were consid-ered significant at p < 0.05. Results: The majority of the respondents were males (91, 58%), married (108, 68.7%), and between 31 and 50 years old (106, 67.5%). Most have had tertiary education (84, 53.5%) and farming experience between 1 and 5 years (97, 61.8%). All the respondents have heard about coccidiosis previously, and of these, 57 (36.3%), 45 (28.7%), and 37 (23.6%) sourced this information from veterinarians, fellow farmers, and during training/workshops, respectively. Ingestion of faecally contaminated feed and water by chickens was opined as the cause of coccidiosis by 48 (30.6%) respondents, followed by bacteria (30, 19.1%) and poor hygiene and sanitation (27, 17.2%). Most mentioned that ingesting faecally contaminated feed and water (126, 80.2%) is the mode of coccidiosis transmission, and 76 (48.4%) identified bloody and watery diarrhea as the major clinical sign. The gender of the farmers and their educational status were significantly associated with the level of coccidiosis knowledge. Of the study participants, 150 (95.5%) have experienced an outbreak of coccidiosis on their farms before, and the majority observed bloody diarrhea (90, 60.0%) as the major clinical sign. None of the farmers used ionophore drugs. Embazin-forte® (Sulphaquinoxaline) was the drug most reportedly used to prevent and treat coccidiosis. Few farmers (11, 7%) adopted anticoccidial vaccines for coccidiosis prevention using either Immucox®, Livacox®, or both. Conclusion: This study showed that poultry farmers in Lagos State have adequate knowledge of chicken coccidiosis. Chemical anticoccidials were the only drugs used for prevention and treatment, and vaccines were not adopted. There is a need for veterinarians and poultry extension workers to enlighten farmers in the study area about the proper, safe, and effective use of anticoccidial drugs and vaccines.
尼日利亚拉各斯州家禽养殖户控制鸡球虫病的知识、态度和做法
背景:球虫病是由艾美耳球虫属球虫引起的,在全球家禽业中造成重大生产损失。本研究评估了尼日利亚拉各斯州商业家禽养殖户对鸡球虫病及其控制的知识、态度和做法。方法:采用半结构式问卷对157户农户进行鸡球虫病及其防治相关kap评估。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)软件对整理后的数据进行汇总统计。调查对象的知识与人口统计学特征之间的关系采用SPSS独立的卡方检验进行分析。p < 0.05认为结果显著。结果:调查对象以男性(91.58%)、已婚(108.68.7%)、31 ~ 50岁(106.67.5%)为主。大多数人受过高等教育(84,53.5%),有1至5年的农业经验(97,61.8%)。所有应答者以前都听说过球虫病,其中57人(36.3%)、45人(28.7%)和37人(23.6%)分别从兽医、同行农民和培训/讲习班中获得信息。48人(30.6%)认为鸡摄入粪便污染的饲料和水是导致球虫病的原因,其次是细菌(30人,19.1%)和卫生条件差(27人,17.2%)。大多数病例(126例,80.2%)提到食用粪便污染的饲料和水是球虫病的传播方式,76例(48.4%)认为血性水样腹泻是球虫病的主要临床症状。农民性别、文化程度与球虫病知识水平显著相关。研究参与者中,150人(95.5%)曾在其农场暴发过球虫病,多数以带血腹泻(90人,60.0%)为主要临床症状。没有一个农民使用离子载体药物。Embazin-forte®(Sulphaquinoxaline)是最常用于预防和治疗球虫病的药物。很少有农民(11.7%)采用Immucox®、Livacox®或两者兼用的抗球虫疫苗预防球虫病。结论:本研究表明拉各斯州的家禽养殖户对鸡球虫病有足够的了解。化学抗球虫是唯一用于预防和治疗的药物,而不采用疫苗。兽医和家禽推广工作者需要向研究地区的农民介绍如何正确、安全和有效地使用抗球虫药物和疫苗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信