The influence of the accessibility of concentrate on the behaviour of cows milked in an automatic milking system

C. D. Lauwere, A. H. Ipema, J. Metz, J. Noordhuizen, W. Schouten
{"title":"The influence of the accessibility of concentrate on the behaviour of cows milked in an automatic milking system","authors":"C. D. Lauwere, A. H. Ipema, J. Metz, J. Noordhuizen, W. Schouten","doi":"10.18174/njas.v47i1.475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advantages and disadvantages are discussed of forcing cows to visit the automatic milking parlour regularly by making it the only way for them to obtain supplementary feeds, vs. allowing cows to choose the frequency of their visits to the parlour. An alternative routing method was studied, in which the cows could move freely between the feeding and lying areas, but were stimulated to visit the automatic parlour by making it the only way of accessing the concentrate feeder. Two experiments were conducted, each with 2 treatments and 20 Holstein Friesian dairy cows. In the first treatment of experiment 1, the concentrate feeder was accessible only via the automatic parlour, and in the second treatment of experiment 1, concentrates were freely accessible. In both cases a new portion of concentrate became available once every 2 h. In experiment 2, the concentrate feeder was available only via the automatic parlour. A new portion of concentrate became available every 2 h during the first treatment of this experiment and every 4 h during the second treatment. Results showed that allocation of concentrate in a feeder which can only be reached via the automatic parlour is a good stimulus to attract cows to the parlour on a regular basis, because the milking frequency of these groups increased, and the waiting time in front of the concentrate feeder and the number of aggressive interactions in this area decreased. It is concluded that it is better to make concentrate available once every 4 h than once every 2 h, because this increases concentrate intake and rest in the barn.","PeriodicalId":324908,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18174/njas.v47i1.475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

The advantages and disadvantages are discussed of forcing cows to visit the automatic milking parlour regularly by making it the only way for them to obtain supplementary feeds, vs. allowing cows to choose the frequency of their visits to the parlour. An alternative routing method was studied, in which the cows could move freely between the feeding and lying areas, but were stimulated to visit the automatic parlour by making it the only way of accessing the concentrate feeder. Two experiments were conducted, each with 2 treatments and 20 Holstein Friesian dairy cows. In the first treatment of experiment 1, the concentrate feeder was accessible only via the automatic parlour, and in the second treatment of experiment 1, concentrates were freely accessible. In both cases a new portion of concentrate became available once every 2 h. In experiment 2, the concentrate feeder was available only via the automatic parlour. A new portion of concentrate became available every 2 h during the first treatment of this experiment and every 4 h during the second treatment. Results showed that allocation of concentrate in a feeder which can only be reached via the automatic parlour is a good stimulus to attract cows to the parlour on a regular basis, because the milking frequency of these groups increased, and the waiting time in front of the concentrate feeder and the number of aggressive interactions in this area decreased. It is concluded that it is better to make concentrate available once every 4 h than once every 2 h, because this increases concentrate intake and rest in the barn.
在自动挤奶系统中,浓缩液的可及性对奶牛行为的影响
讨论了强迫奶牛定期访问自动挤奶室(使其成为奶牛获得补充饲料的唯一途径)与允许奶牛选择访问自动挤奶室的频率的利弊。研究了一种替代路线方法,其中奶牛可以在喂食区和躺卧区之间自由移动,但通过使其成为进入浓缩喂食器的唯一途径来刺激其访问自动客厅。2个试验,每组2个处理,20头荷斯坦弗里西亚奶牛。在试验1的第一个处理中,精矿给料机只能通过自动回收站进入;在试验1的第二个处理中,精矿可以自由进入。在这两种情况下,每2小时可获得一次新的浓缩物。在实验2中,浓缩物给料机仅通过自动进料室提供。本试验第一次处理每2 h和第二次处理每4 h可获得一份新浓缩物。结果表明,在一个只能通过自动喂食室才能到达的喂食器中分配精料是一个很好的刺激,可以吸引奶牛定期到该喂食室,因为这些群体的挤奶频率增加了,在浓缩喂食器前等待的时间和该区域的攻击性相互作用次数减少了。综上所述,每4 h补饲精料优于每2 h补饲精料,可增加精料的采食量和牲口棚内的休息时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信