Comparison of Clinicopathologic Features and Outcomes Between Synchronous and Metachronous Bilateral Breast Cancer

Jun Hyung Kim, T. Won
{"title":"Comparison of Clinicopathologic Features and Outcomes Between Synchronous and Metachronous Bilateral Breast Cancer","authors":"Jun Hyung Kim, T. Won","doi":"10.14449/jbd.2023.11.1.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Bilateral breast cancer (BBC) can be divided into two concurrent lesions, depending on the time of occurrence of primary cancer and secondary tumors after treatment of the primary cancer. This study aimed to compare the clinicopathological characteristics and results of synchronous BBC (SBBC) and metachronous BBC (MBBC).Methods: Data of patients diagnosed with breast cancer at Wonkwang university Hospital between October 1991 and October 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Data of 3,259 patients who were diagnosed with malignant neoplasm of the right or left breast were reviewed. The tumor was defined as SBBC when another cancer was identified as BBC simultaneously or within six months after the primary breast cancer, and as MBBC when another cancer was identified after six months. Among patients with BBC, 31 had SBBC and 32 had MBBC.Results: In SBBC patients, the median age was 59.9 years, and the condition was diagnosed 3.3 years later compared with MBBC. The primary and secondary tumors of SBBC had lower disease stage, even when diagnosed late. Except for tumor, node, and metastasis stage, MBBC showed more invasive ductal carcinoma, while SBBC showed relatively more ductal carcinoma in situ in both primary and secondary tumors compared with MBBC. In addition, SBBC showed lower hormone receptor positivity rates and Ki-67 levels compared with MBBC. MBBC patients showed a higher survival rate compared with SBBC patients. MBBC is associated with higher overall survival rate compared with SBBC, and its prognosis is not worse compared with that of unilateral breast cancer. In the case of secondary tumor that develops in the contralateral breast without evidence of metastasis, the survival rate is similar to that of unilateral breast cancer, while the treatment is similar to that of primary tumor.Conclusion: As those with SBBC have a worse survival, these patients will require more medical attention; meanwhile, MBBC requires an active treatment approach that is equivalent to that for unilateral breast cancer.","PeriodicalId":245382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Disease","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14449/jbd.2023.11.1.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Bilateral breast cancer (BBC) can be divided into two concurrent lesions, depending on the time of occurrence of primary cancer and secondary tumors after treatment of the primary cancer. This study aimed to compare the clinicopathological characteristics and results of synchronous BBC (SBBC) and metachronous BBC (MBBC).Methods: Data of patients diagnosed with breast cancer at Wonkwang university Hospital between October 1991 and October 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Data of 3,259 patients who were diagnosed with malignant neoplasm of the right or left breast were reviewed. The tumor was defined as SBBC when another cancer was identified as BBC simultaneously or within six months after the primary breast cancer, and as MBBC when another cancer was identified after six months. Among patients with BBC, 31 had SBBC and 32 had MBBC.Results: In SBBC patients, the median age was 59.9 years, and the condition was diagnosed 3.3 years later compared with MBBC. The primary and secondary tumors of SBBC had lower disease stage, even when diagnosed late. Except for tumor, node, and metastasis stage, MBBC showed more invasive ductal carcinoma, while SBBC showed relatively more ductal carcinoma in situ in both primary and secondary tumors compared with MBBC. In addition, SBBC showed lower hormone receptor positivity rates and Ki-67 levels compared with MBBC. MBBC patients showed a higher survival rate compared with SBBC patients. MBBC is associated with higher overall survival rate compared with SBBC, and its prognosis is not worse compared with that of unilateral breast cancer. In the case of secondary tumor that develops in the contralateral breast without evidence of metastasis, the survival rate is similar to that of unilateral breast cancer, while the treatment is similar to that of primary tumor.Conclusion: As those with SBBC have a worse survival, these patients will require more medical attention; meanwhile, MBBC requires an active treatment approach that is equivalent to that for unilateral breast cancer.
双侧同步与异时性乳腺癌的临床病理特征及预后比较
目的:双侧乳腺癌(BBC)根据原发癌和原发癌治疗后继发肿瘤的发生时间可分为两种并发病变。本研究旨在比较同步性BBC (SBBC)和异时性BBC (MBBC)的临床病理特点和结果。方法:回顾性分析1991年10月至2021年10月在圆光大学医院诊断为乳腺癌的患者资料。本文回顾了3259例被诊断为左右乳腺恶性肿瘤的患者的资料。当原发乳腺癌同时或6个月内发现另一种癌症为BBC时,定义为SBBC, 6个月后发现另一种癌症时定义为MBBC。其中31例为SBBC, 32例为MBBC。结果:SBBC患者的中位年龄为59.9岁,诊断时间比MBBC晚3.3年。SBBC的原发性和继发性肿瘤即使诊断较晚,病程也较低。除肿瘤、淋巴结和转移分期外,MBBC表现出更多浸润性导管癌,而SBBC在原发和继发肿瘤中均较MBBC表现出更多导管原位癌。此外,SBBC的激素受体阳性率和Ki-67水平均低于MBBC。MBBC患者的生存率高于SBBC患者。与SBBC相比,MBBC的总生存率更高,其预后并不比单侧乳腺癌差。继发性肿瘤发生于对侧乳腺,无转移迹象,其生存率与单侧乳腺癌相似,治疗方法与原发肿瘤相似。结论:SBBC患者生存期较差,需要更多的医疗护理;同时,MBBC需要一种相当于单侧乳腺癌的积极治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信