The Trajectory of Psychological Safety in Engineering Teams: A Longitudinal Exploration in Engineering Design Education

Scarlett R. Miller, Jacqueline Marhefka, K. Heininger, K. Jablokow, S. Mohammed, Sarah C. Ritter
{"title":"The Trajectory of Psychological Safety in Engineering Teams: A Longitudinal Exploration in Engineering Design Education","authors":"Scarlett R. Miller, Jacqueline Marhefka, K. Heininger, K. Jablokow, S. Mohammed, Sarah C. Ritter","doi":"10.1115/detc2019-97562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although teamwork is being integrated throughout engineering education because of the perceived benefits of teams, the construct of psychological safety has been largely ignored in engineering research. This omission is unfortunate, because psychological safety reflects collective perceptions about how comfortable team members feel in sharing their perspectives and it has been found to positively impact team performance in samples outside of engineering [20]. Engineering team research has also been crippled by “snap-shot” methodologies and the resulting lack of investigation into the dynamic changes that happen within a team over course projects. This is problematic, because we do not know when, how, or what type of interventions are needed to effectively improve “t-shaped” engineering skills like teamwork, communication, and engaging successfully in a diverse team. In light of these issues, the goal of the current study was to understand how psychological safety might be measured practically and reliably in engineering student teams over time. In addition, we sought to identify the trajectory of psychological safety for engineering design student teams and identify the potential factors that impact the building and waning of psychological safety in these teams. This was accomplished through a 4-week study with 12 engineering design teams where data was captured at six time points. The results of this study present some of the first evidence on the reliability of psychological safety in engineering student populations. The results also help begin to answer some difficult fundamental questions on supporting team performance in engineering education.","PeriodicalId":143350,"journal":{"name":"Volume 7: 31st International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology","volume":"436 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 7: 31st International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2019-97562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Although teamwork is being integrated throughout engineering education because of the perceived benefits of teams, the construct of psychological safety has been largely ignored in engineering research. This omission is unfortunate, because psychological safety reflects collective perceptions about how comfortable team members feel in sharing their perspectives and it has been found to positively impact team performance in samples outside of engineering [20]. Engineering team research has also been crippled by “snap-shot” methodologies and the resulting lack of investigation into the dynamic changes that happen within a team over course projects. This is problematic, because we do not know when, how, or what type of interventions are needed to effectively improve “t-shaped” engineering skills like teamwork, communication, and engaging successfully in a diverse team. In light of these issues, the goal of the current study was to understand how psychological safety might be measured practically and reliably in engineering student teams over time. In addition, we sought to identify the trajectory of psychological safety for engineering design student teams and identify the potential factors that impact the building and waning of psychological safety in these teams. This was accomplished through a 4-week study with 12 engineering design teams where data was captured at six time points. The results of this study present some of the first evidence on the reliability of psychological safety in engineering student populations. The results also help begin to answer some difficult fundamental questions on supporting team performance in engineering education.
工程团队心理安全的轨迹:工程设计教育的纵向探索
虽然由于团队的利益意识,团队合作已被纳入工程教育,但在工程研究中,心理安全的构建在很大程度上被忽视了。这种遗漏是不幸的,因为心理安全反映了集体对团队成员在分享他们的观点时的舒适程度的看法,并且在工程以外的样本中发现它对团队绩效有积极影响[20]。工程团队的研究也被“快照”方法所削弱,并因此缺乏对团队在课程项目中发生的动态变化的调查。这是有问题的,因为我们不知道什么时候,如何,或者什么类型的干预需要有效地提高“t”型工程技能,如团队合作,沟通,并成功地参与到一个多样化的团队中。鉴于这些问题,当前研究的目标是了解如何在工程学生团队中实际可靠地测量心理安全。此外,我们试图确定工程设计专业学生团队心理安全的发展轨迹,并确定影响这些团队心理安全建立和减弱的潜在因素。这是通过12个工程设计团队为期4周的研究完成的,在6个时间点捕获数据。本研究的结果为工科学生群体心理安全的可靠性提供了一些初步证据。结果也有助于开始回答一些困难的基本问题,支持团队绩效在工程教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信