Reliability Assessment of Protection Schemes for Series Compensated Transmission Lines

M. T. Hoq, Md Zakaria Habib, E. Shayesteh, N. Taylor
{"title":"Reliability Assessment of Protection Schemes for Series Compensated Transmission Lines","authors":"M. T. Hoq, Md Zakaria Habib, E. Shayesteh, N. Taylor","doi":"10.1109/ICSRS48664.2019.8987728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Series capacitors are used in transmission lines for enhancing power transmission limit. However, they complicate the line's protection due to impedance change of the line, voltage inversion, current inversion and sub-synchronous oscillation. Distance and differential protections are used in different arrangements in transmission line protection. Often they are used together as main and backup protection. In this paper, the fault tree method is used to compare the reliability of three common transmission line protection schemes. The schemes considered here are distance (main)-distance (backup) $(Z,\\ Z)$. differential (main)-distance (backup) $(\\Delta,\\ Z)$ and differential (main)-differential (backup) $(\\Delta,\\ \\Delta)$. Fault trees are used to calculate the reliability of protection schemes in terms of both unavailability and failure rate. The analyses show that, for series compensated lines, using distance protection reduces protection system reliability. Differential protection performs best in terms of reliability despite depending entirely on communication.","PeriodicalId":430931,"journal":{"name":"2019 4th International Conference on System Reliability and Safety (ICSRS)","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 4th International Conference on System Reliability and Safety (ICSRS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSRS48664.2019.8987728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Series capacitors are used in transmission lines for enhancing power transmission limit. However, they complicate the line's protection due to impedance change of the line, voltage inversion, current inversion and sub-synchronous oscillation. Distance and differential protections are used in different arrangements in transmission line protection. Often they are used together as main and backup protection. In this paper, the fault tree method is used to compare the reliability of three common transmission line protection schemes. The schemes considered here are distance (main)-distance (backup) $(Z,\ Z)$. differential (main)-distance (backup) $(\Delta,\ Z)$ and differential (main)-differential (backup) $(\Delta,\ \Delta)$. Fault trees are used to calculate the reliability of protection schemes in terms of both unavailability and failure rate. The analyses show that, for series compensated lines, using distance protection reduces protection system reliability. Differential protection performs best in terms of reliability despite depending entirely on communication.
串联补偿输电线路保护方案可靠性评估
串联电容器用于输电线路中,以提高输电极限。但是,由于线路的阻抗变化、电压反转、电流反转和次同步振荡,使线路的保护复杂化。在传输线保护中,距离保护和差动保护采用不同的布置方式。它们通常作为主保护和备份保护一起使用。本文采用故障树法对三种常见的输电线路保护方案的可靠性进行了比较。这里考虑的方案是distance (main)-distance (backup) $(Z,\ Z)$。微分(主)-距离(备份)$ (\Delta,\ Z)$和微分(主)-差分(备份)$ (\Delta,\ \Delta)$。故障树用于从不可用性和故障率两方面计算保护方案的可靠性。分析表明,对于串联补偿线路,采用距离保护会降低保护系统的可靠性。差动保护在可靠性方面表现最好,尽管完全依赖于通信。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信