The Melbourne Journey Towards Improved City Liveability: A Revival of a Dead City (Case of Melbourne CBD)

Karim Magdy Shafiq Mohamed
{"title":"The Melbourne Journey Towards Improved City Liveability: A Revival of a Dead City (Case of Melbourne CBD)","authors":"Karim Magdy Shafiq Mohamed","doi":"10.21608/erj.2022.272640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Achieving liveable communities in cities has gained growing interest worldwide over the past twenty years. It is evident in various scientific literature arguing the livability notion from different scientific disciplines, such as social and environmental science. Indeed, the Liveability notion is ambiguous and complex that is perceived differentially according to each scientific discipline’s perspective. Moreover, establishing a consensus over a united understanding of the “Liveability Dimensions” term might be unreachable. Despite having appeared repetitively among various academic studies, the intended meaning and content of the “Liveability Dimensions” term is not necessarily held the same. Indeed, several scholars and organizations have defined the Liveability dimensions. However, every one of them has introduced his comprehension of Liveability dimensions based on his perspective or experience drawn from other scholars’ research. Through a case study analysis, this paper intends to establish a general understanding and background for the Liveability notion and shed light on the practical meaning of the Liveability Dimensions. The study was conducted in one of the top liveable cities worldwide, the City of Melbourne CBD. It is a city that is referred to be among the pioneers interested in the field of achieving liveable cities over the globe. The case study analysis was performed based on three main categories that combined reflected the livability dimensions: Physical and Environmental Indices, Economic Indices, and Social Indices. Through the study analysis, this paper concluded with a set of urban, economic, and social indices that contribute to creating Liveable city centers, where people, in the same area, can live, work, and entertain.","PeriodicalId":161226,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Research Journal","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/erj.2022.272640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Achieving liveable communities in cities has gained growing interest worldwide over the past twenty years. It is evident in various scientific literature arguing the livability notion from different scientific disciplines, such as social and environmental science. Indeed, the Liveability notion is ambiguous and complex that is perceived differentially according to each scientific discipline’s perspective. Moreover, establishing a consensus over a united understanding of the “Liveability Dimensions” term might be unreachable. Despite having appeared repetitively among various academic studies, the intended meaning and content of the “Liveability Dimensions” term is not necessarily held the same. Indeed, several scholars and organizations have defined the Liveability dimensions. However, every one of them has introduced his comprehension of Liveability dimensions based on his perspective or experience drawn from other scholars’ research. Through a case study analysis, this paper intends to establish a general understanding and background for the Liveability notion and shed light on the practical meaning of the Liveability Dimensions. The study was conducted in one of the top liveable cities worldwide, the City of Melbourne CBD. It is a city that is referred to be among the pioneers interested in the field of achieving liveable cities over the globe. The case study analysis was performed based on three main categories that combined reflected the livability dimensions: Physical and Environmental Indices, Economic Indices, and Social Indices. Through the study analysis, this paper concluded with a set of urban, economic, and social indices that contribute to creating Liveable city centers, where people, in the same area, can live, work, and entertain.
墨尔本改善城市宜居性之旅:一座死城的复兴(以墨尔本CBD为例)
在过去的二十年里,在城市中实现宜居社区已经引起了全世界越来越多的兴趣。从不同的科学学科,如社会科学和环境科学,论证宜居性概念的各种科学文献中都可以明显看出这一点。事实上,宜居性概念是模糊而复杂的,根据每个科学学科的观点,人们会有不同的看法。此外,就“宜居性维度”一词的统一理解达成共识可能是无法实现的。尽管在各种学术研究中反复出现,但“宜居性维度”一词的预期含义和内容并不一定相同。事实上,一些学者和组织已经定义了宜居性维度。然而,他们每个人都根据自己的观点或借鉴其他学者的研究经验,介绍了自己对宜居性维度的理解。本文旨在通过案例分析,建立对宜居性概念的总体理解和背景,并阐明宜居性维度的现实意义。这项研究是在全球最宜居的城市之一墨尔本CBD进行的。这个城市被认为是对实现全球宜居城市领域感兴趣的先驱之一。案例分析是基于三个主要类别进行的,这些类别综合反映了宜居性的维度:物理和环境指数、经济指数和社会指数。通过研究分析,本文总结了一套有助于创建宜居城市中心的城市,经济和社会指标,人们可以在同一地区生活,工作和娱乐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信