Decision-making for cable routing at detailed ship design through life cycle and cost assessment

Muki Park, B. Jeong, Mingyu Kim
{"title":"Decision-making for cable routing at detailed ship design through life cycle and cost assessment","authors":"Muki Park, B. Jeong, Mingyu Kim","doi":"10.1080/25725084.2020.1804212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper was to establish a practical approach to evaluating economic and eco-friendly designs for cable arrangement on the deck-side of offshore vessels. Three credible options were identified: acableway arrangement on the main deck alone; the arrangement using both the main deck and passageways; and the arrangement using passageway alone. Each design option was investigated, and their economic and environmental impacts were quantified in aholistic view by Life Cycle and Cost Assessment. The economic and environmental impacts were normalized into monetary values to evaluate the best design option overall. Results revealed that the cableway arrangement using only passageways was the best solution, showing that the total cost of the design was estimated at 308,573 USD, which was 130,010 USD less than the cost of the worst option using only the main deck. The case study proved the effectiveness of the proposed approach to determine an optimal design from avariety of choices, which offers insight into current problems that have underestimated the influence of ship designs on environmental impact. In order to enhance the cleaner production, the proposed approach can be widely applied to every part of shipbuilding such as designing of hull, piping and outfitting.","PeriodicalId":261809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25725084.2020.1804212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper was to establish a practical approach to evaluating economic and eco-friendly designs for cable arrangement on the deck-side of offshore vessels. Three credible options were identified: acableway arrangement on the main deck alone; the arrangement using both the main deck and passageways; and the arrangement using passageway alone. Each design option was investigated, and their economic and environmental impacts were quantified in aholistic view by Life Cycle and Cost Assessment. The economic and environmental impacts were normalized into monetary values to evaluate the best design option overall. Results revealed that the cableway arrangement using only passageways was the best solution, showing that the total cost of the design was estimated at 308,573 USD, which was 130,010 USD less than the cost of the worst option using only the main deck. The case study proved the effectiveness of the proposed approach to determine an optimal design from avariety of choices, which offers insight into current problems that have underestimated the influence of ship designs on environmental impact. In order to enhance the cleaner production, the proposed approach can be widely applied to every part of shipbuilding such as designing of hull, piping and outfitting.
通过寿命周期和成本评估对船舶详细设计中的电缆敷设进行决策
摘要:本文旨在建立一种实用的方法来评估近海船舶甲板侧电缆布置的经济和环保设计。确定了三种可靠的方案:仅在主甲板上设置通道;使用主甲板和通道的布置;并单独使用通道进行布置。对每个设计方案进行了调查,并通过生命周期和成本评估对其经济和环境影响进行了整体量化。经济和环境影响被归一化为货币价值,以评估整体的最佳设计方案。结果表明,仅使用通道的索道布置是最佳方案,总设计成本估计为308,573美元,比仅使用主甲板的最差方案成本低130,010美元。案例研究证明了所提出的方法在从各种选择中确定最佳设计的有效性,这为当前低估船舶设计对环境影响的影响的问题提供了见解。该方法可广泛应用于船舶的船体设计、管道设计、舾装等各个环节,以提高船舶的清洁生产水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信