Conclusion

B. Asher
{"title":"Conclusion","authors":"B. Asher","doi":"10.5810/kentucky/9780813181370.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is easy to sympathize with those who hated Burbridge for his suppression of civil liberties, his interference in state politics, and his executions of prisoners. This is why the historical context of his actions is so important to understand. Much of the opposition to Burbridge—during the war and afterward—stemmed from white Kentuckians’ opposition to emancipation. His enemies couched their opposition in the language of individual rights, but it was an understanding of rights that excluded African Americans. Burbridge was charged with bringing a new understanding of freedom to Kentucky. He tried to do so, taking measures to control Kentuckians’ growing opposition to the changed aims of the war. In doing so, he earned the unbounded loathing of his contemporaries and the unmerited scorn of historians.","PeriodicalId":356541,"journal":{"name":"The Most Hated Man in Kentucky","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Most Hated Man in Kentucky","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5810/kentucky/9780813181370.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is easy to sympathize with those who hated Burbridge for his suppression of civil liberties, his interference in state politics, and his executions of prisoners. This is why the historical context of his actions is so important to understand. Much of the opposition to Burbridge—during the war and afterward—stemmed from white Kentuckians’ opposition to emancipation. His enemies couched their opposition in the language of individual rights, but it was an understanding of rights that excluded African Americans. Burbridge was charged with bringing a new understanding of freedom to Kentucky. He tried to do so, taking measures to control Kentuckians’ growing opposition to the changed aims of the war. In doing so, he earned the unbounded loathing of his contemporaries and the unmerited scorn of historians.
结论
人们很容易同情那些憎恨伯布里奇压制公民自由、干涉国家政治和处决囚犯的人。这就是为什么理解他的行为的历史背景是如此重要。在战争期间和战争结束后,对伯布里奇的反对大多来自于肯塔基白人对解放的反对。他的敌人用个人权利的语言表达他们的反对,但这是一种对权利的理解,将非洲裔美国人排除在外。伯布里奇肩负着给肯塔基州带来对自由的新理解的重任。他试图做到这一点,采取措施控制肯塔基人对改变战争目标的日益强烈的反对。在这一过程中,他赢得了同时代人的无限厌恶和历史学家的无理蔑视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信