Chinese Sentiment Analysis of MOOC Reviews Based on Word Vectors

Hua Yang
{"title":"Chinese Sentiment Analysis of MOOC Reviews Based on Word Vectors","authors":"Hua Yang","doi":"10.1109/ICAIE53562.2021.00021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sentiment analysis of MOOC reviews can reflect learners’ learning feelings, topics of interest and satisfaction with courses to platform managers and teachers, so as to help them make improvements and improve the quality of teaching. Potential learners can also find out the emotional information carried by the attributes of the courses they care about according to the reviews, which can be used as the basis for choosing courses or not. From the perspective of word vectors, this paper uses two word vector tools, Word2vec and Glove, to train MOOC review word vector data respectively, compares the impact of the two word vector tools on sentiment analysis, and visualizes the weight of attention. The experiment found that Word2vec was better than Glove on the whole, and the CBOW model under Word2vec had the best performance in binary classification, while the skip-gram model had the best performance in three classification. In addition, the effects of the two tools in finding similar words in new words was discussed. The experiment found that the Word2vec was better than the Glove, and the skip-gram model was more accurate than the CBOW model.","PeriodicalId":285278,"journal":{"name":"2021 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (ICAIE)","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (ICAIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIE53562.2021.00021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sentiment analysis of MOOC reviews can reflect learners’ learning feelings, topics of interest and satisfaction with courses to platform managers and teachers, so as to help them make improvements and improve the quality of teaching. Potential learners can also find out the emotional information carried by the attributes of the courses they care about according to the reviews, which can be used as the basis for choosing courses or not. From the perspective of word vectors, this paper uses two word vector tools, Word2vec and Glove, to train MOOC review word vector data respectively, compares the impact of the two word vector tools on sentiment analysis, and visualizes the weight of attention. The experiment found that Word2vec was better than Glove on the whole, and the CBOW model under Word2vec had the best performance in binary classification, while the skip-gram model had the best performance in three classification. In addition, the effects of the two tools in finding similar words in new words was discussed. The experiment found that the Word2vec was better than the Glove, and the skip-gram model was more accurate than the CBOW model.
基于词向量的MOOC评论中文情感分析
MOOC评论的情感分析可以向平台管理者和教师反映学习者的学习感受、感兴趣的话题和对课程的满意度,从而帮助他们进行改进,提高教学质量。潜在学习者还可以通过评论发现自己所关心的课程属性所承载的情感信息,作为选择或不选择课程的依据。本文从词向量的角度出发,分别使用Word2vec和Glove两种词向量工具对MOOC复习词向量数据进行训练,比较两种词向量工具对情感分析的影响,并对关注权重进行可视化。实验发现,Word2vec总体上优于Glove, Word2vec下的CBOW模型在二分类中表现最好,而skip-gram模型在三分类中表现最好。此外,还讨论了这两种工具在新词中查找相似词方面的作用。实验发现,Word2vec优于Glove, skip-gram模型优于CBOW模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信