Re-engaging Citizens in Europe and North America

Brian Wampler, Stephanie L. McNulty, Michael Touchton
{"title":"Re-engaging Citizens in Europe and North America","authors":"Brian Wampler, Stephanie L. McNulty, Michael Touchton","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192897756.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The spread of PB in the North Atlantic region (Europe, the United States, and Canada) is taking place as citizen apathy, declining trust, social exclusion, and growing inequalities spread in these wealthier democracies. By 2016, major cities such as New York City, Paris, Madrid, Barcelona, Lisbon, Chicago, Boston, Seattle, Toronto, and Seville adopted some form of PB. The national governments in Poland and Portugal now mandate some form of PB. The authors see significant institutional innovation in these PB processes as PB’s original rules have been reimagined to address different types of problems. New York City and Chicago initiated their PB programs at sub-municipal levels. Paris, Madrid, and Barcelona had adapted their PB programs to strongly emphasize online participation. At the broadest level, PB in Europe and North America is more heavily geared toward civic education and community empowerment than toward the redistribution of spending priorities. In some place PB remains a democratic institution that retains some of the radical features of the first wave but it is also a policymaking tool in other places, designed to generate government efficiencies. Most importantly, most programs retain the radical idea that a wide variety of citizens, especially those from politically weaker and more marginalized groups, should be directly involved in decision-making.","PeriodicalId":314567,"journal":{"name":"Participatory Budgeting in Global Perspective","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Participatory Budgeting in Global Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192897756.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The spread of PB in the North Atlantic region (Europe, the United States, and Canada) is taking place as citizen apathy, declining trust, social exclusion, and growing inequalities spread in these wealthier democracies. By 2016, major cities such as New York City, Paris, Madrid, Barcelona, Lisbon, Chicago, Boston, Seattle, Toronto, and Seville adopted some form of PB. The national governments in Poland and Portugal now mandate some form of PB. The authors see significant institutional innovation in these PB processes as PB’s original rules have been reimagined to address different types of problems. New York City and Chicago initiated their PB programs at sub-municipal levels. Paris, Madrid, and Barcelona had adapted their PB programs to strongly emphasize online participation. At the broadest level, PB in Europe and North America is more heavily geared toward civic education and community empowerment than toward the redistribution of spending priorities. In some place PB remains a democratic institution that retains some of the radical features of the first wave but it is also a policymaking tool in other places, designed to generate government efficiencies. Most importantly, most programs retain the radical idea that a wide variety of citizens, especially those from politically weaker and more marginalized groups, should be directly involved in decision-making.
在欧洲和北美重新吸引公民
在北大西洋地区(欧洲、美国和加拿大),随着公民冷漠、信任下降、社会排斥和日益严重的不平等现象在这些较富裕的民主国家蔓延,PB正在蔓延。到2016年,纽约、巴黎、马德里、巴塞罗那、里斯本、芝加哥、波士顿、西雅图、多伦多和塞维利亚等主要城市都采用了某种形式的PB。波兰和葡萄牙的国家政府现在强制执行某种形式的PB。作者在这些PB过程中看到了重大的制度创新,因为PB的原始规则已经被重新构想,以解决不同类型的问题。纽约市和芝加哥在次市层面启动了PB计划。巴黎、马德里和巴塞罗那已经调整了他们的PB计划,强烈强调在线参与。在最广泛的层面上,欧洲和北美的PB更侧重于公民教育和社区赋权,而不是支出优先事项的再分配。在一些地方,PB仍然是一种民主制度,保留了第一波的一些激进特征,但在其他地方,它也是一种决策工具,旨在提高政府效率。最重要的是,大多数计划都保留了一个激进的想法,即各种各样的公民,特别是那些来自政治上较弱和更边缘化的群体的公民,应该直接参与决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信