How'd they do that: modified instructional system

George Bradford, Horace Brown
{"title":"How'd they do that: modified instructional system","authors":"George Bradford, Horace Brown","doi":"10.1145/1181216.1181224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explains how we modified our instructional system to improve technical training quality and how we trimmed down-training time. It explains how we accomplished all this with a relatively small staff and a limited budget. At the outset, our vision was to put in place a viable on-site technical training program and one that our faculty and staff would voluntarily choose to attend for their initial or refresher training. Our goal was to produce a sustainable, good and highly interactive technical training program. We knew that to accomplish what we wanted, we would have to use our own design and development capabilities to modify vendor supplied course materials. Unfortunately, most technical training courseware available through commercial agencies usually requires six to eight hours to instruct and is focused primarily on business training scenarios rather than universities like ours. This complicated our problem even more, because, if true, it meant we would need to, at least consider, modifying all courses we would get from vendors.Despite the challenges, we are realizing our vision and we met our goal. Our learners voluntarily attend our training and their feedback is replete with favorable comments about their learning experience. Our small staff perceived these challenges as an opportunity for us to succeed and succeed we did. We'll tell you the story of how we did it as we go along.","PeriodicalId":131408,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 34th annual ACM SIGUCCS fall conference: expanding the boundaries","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 34th annual ACM SIGUCCS fall conference: expanding the boundaries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1181216.1181224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper explains how we modified our instructional system to improve technical training quality and how we trimmed down-training time. It explains how we accomplished all this with a relatively small staff and a limited budget. At the outset, our vision was to put in place a viable on-site technical training program and one that our faculty and staff would voluntarily choose to attend for their initial or refresher training. Our goal was to produce a sustainable, good and highly interactive technical training program. We knew that to accomplish what we wanted, we would have to use our own design and development capabilities to modify vendor supplied course materials. Unfortunately, most technical training courseware available through commercial agencies usually requires six to eight hours to instruct and is focused primarily on business training scenarios rather than universities like ours. This complicated our problem even more, because, if true, it meant we would need to, at least consider, modifying all courses we would get from vendors.Despite the challenges, we are realizing our vision and we met our goal. Our learners voluntarily attend our training and their feedback is replete with favorable comments about their learning experience. Our small staff perceived these challenges as an opportunity for us to succeed and succeed we did. We'll tell you the story of how we did it as we go along.
他们是怎么做到的,修改教学系统吗
本文阐述了我们如何改进教学体系以提高技术培训质量,以及我们如何缩短培训时间。它解释了我们如何以相对较少的员工和有限的预算完成所有这些工作。一开始,我们的愿景是建立一个可行的现场技术培训项目,我们的教职员工将自愿选择参加他们的初始培训或进修培训。我们的目标是建立一个可持续的、良好的、高度互动的技术培训项目。我们知道,要完成我们想要的,我们必须使用我们自己的设计和开发能力来修改供应商提供的课程材料。不幸的是,大多数通过商业机构提供的技术培训课件通常需要6到8个小时的指导,主要集中在商业培训场景,而不是像我们这样的大学。这使我们的问题更加复杂,因为,如果这是真的,这意味着我们需要,至少考虑,修改我们从供应商那里得到的所有课程。尽管面临挑战,但我们正在实现我们的愿景,并实现了我们的目标。我们的学员自愿参加我们的培训,他们的反馈对他们的学习经历充满了好评。我们的小员工认为这些挑战是我们成功的机会,我们确实成功了。我们会告诉你我们是如何做到的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信