Taḥlīl al-Dalāli fī Qaṣīdah “Ażfaita” li al-Syaikh Misyārī Rāsyīd al-‘Affāsī

Illa Lailatus Sa'adah
{"title":"Taḥlīl al-Dalāli fī Qaṣīdah “Ażfaita” li al-Syaikh Misyārī Rāsyīd al-‘Affāsī","authors":"Illa Lailatus Sa'adah","doi":"10.37680/aphorisme.v3i1.1126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study reveals the various responses to the text of Nazm Alfiyyah Ibn Malik's stanza that developed in Indonesia, especially among Islamic boarding schools. The author uses the aesthetic theory of literary reception by placing Naẓm Alfiyyah Ibn Mālik as a literary text. The results of this study are; The Islamic Boarding School gave birth to two models of responses, responses in the form of works as a whole and responses partially. The first model of Islamic boarding school has a relatively similar response to that of Arab Islamic scholars, tends to be textual so that it is only able to fill a small part of the space in the text of the Nazm Alfiyyah stanza. The second model of Islamic boarding schools gave birth to responses that tended to be contextualistic, out of the nahwu-sarf discussion so that they were able to fill more empty spaces than the first group. From the academics who gave birth to a scientific paper, the response of this group was relatively the same as the first model Islamic boarding school, only the reading process was carried out partially and strictly followed established scientific rules. The creative reader community, who are widely circulated in cyberspace (social media) have responses that tend to be strange (weird), out of habits (rules) that have been established both among Arab Islamic scholars, Islamic boarding schools, and academics.","PeriodicalId":232577,"journal":{"name":"Aphorisme: Journal of Arabic Language, Literature, and Education","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aphorisme: Journal of Arabic Language, Literature, and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37680/aphorisme.v3i1.1126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study reveals the various responses to the text of Nazm Alfiyyah Ibn Malik's stanza that developed in Indonesia, especially among Islamic boarding schools. The author uses the aesthetic theory of literary reception by placing Naẓm Alfiyyah Ibn Mālik as a literary text. The results of this study are; The Islamic Boarding School gave birth to two models of responses, responses in the form of works as a whole and responses partially. The first model of Islamic boarding school has a relatively similar response to that of Arab Islamic scholars, tends to be textual so that it is only able to fill a small part of the space in the text of the Nazm Alfiyyah stanza. The second model of Islamic boarding schools gave birth to responses that tended to be contextualistic, out of the nahwu-sarf discussion so that they were able to fill more empty spaces than the first group. From the academics who gave birth to a scientific paper, the response of this group was relatively the same as the first model Islamic boarding school, only the reading process was carried out partially and strictly followed established scientific rules. The creative reader community, who are widely circulated in cyberspace (social media) have responses that tend to be strange (weird), out of habits (rules) that have been established both among Arab Islamic scholars, Islamic boarding schools, and academics.
这项研究揭示了对纳兹姆·阿尔菲亚·伊本·马利克的诗节文本的各种反应,这种反应在印度尼西亚发展起来,特别是在伊斯兰寄宿学校中。作者运用文学接受美学理论,将Naẓm阿尔菲亚·伊本Mālik作为文学文本。本研究的结果是;伊斯兰寄宿学校产生了两种回应模式,一种是整体的回应,另一种是部分的回应。伊斯兰寄宿学校的第一种模式与阿拉伯伊斯兰学者的反应相对相似,倾向于文本化,因此它只能填补Nazm Alfiyyah节文本的一小部分空间。第二种模式的伊斯兰寄宿学校产生的反应往往是情境主义的,脱离了nahuu -sarf的讨论,因此他们能够填补比第一种模式更多的空白。从发表科学论文的学者来看,这一群体的反应与第一所模范伊斯兰寄宿学校的反应相对相同,只是阅读过程是部分进行的,并严格遵循既定的科学规则。在网络空间(社交媒体)上广泛流传的创意读者群体的反应往往是奇怪的(怪异的),与阿拉伯伊斯兰学者、伊斯兰寄宿学校和学者之间建立的习惯(规则)不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信