{"title":"The Beginning of the Post-modern Geopolitical Epoch and the Peculiarities of the System of Contemporary International Relations in the 21st Century","authors":"G. Zviadadze","doi":"10.33674/220192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After transformation of unipolarity and reformatting world order system,\na question been forwarded on how new system is to be founded on. As it is known\nclassical international relations system developed since Westphalia Agreement\nof 1648 has been composed mainly by the state as key actors of international politics.\nThe system has been developed two type of regimes: soft bipolarity and balance\nof power interchanged in several period of time consequently. One of the\ncharacteristic features of globalization is a fundamental change of the international\nsystem and world order. It differs from the world of post-Cold War period with the\nstance of different actors of international relations on each other as well as with the\nforms of sharing power and that of interconnections. In that context there were four\nphases of the international relations systems: the system of Westphalia, the system\nof Vienna, the system of Versailles, the system of Yalta-Potsdam and later\ninternational relations were transformed into bipolarity one. Since demolishing\nclassical Cold War order and entering into new epoch of anarchic scenario, the\nstates as key actors of the system have been diminishing in favour of so-called “nonstate actors”. However, in the international system of the 21st century, the nationstate still has particular functions. It represents the dominant element of the world\npolitics which can influence the behaviour of the population and non-state actors.","PeriodicalId":256788,"journal":{"name":"Ante Portas - Studia nad bezpieczeństwem","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ante Portas - Studia nad bezpieczeństwem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33674/220192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
After transformation of unipolarity and reformatting world order system,
a question been forwarded on how new system is to be founded on. As it is known
classical international relations system developed since Westphalia Agreement
of 1648 has been composed mainly by the state as key actors of international politics.
The system has been developed two type of regimes: soft bipolarity and balance
of power interchanged in several period of time consequently. One of the
characteristic features of globalization is a fundamental change of the international
system and world order. It differs from the world of post-Cold War period with the
stance of different actors of international relations on each other as well as with the
forms of sharing power and that of interconnections. In that context there were four
phases of the international relations systems: the system of Westphalia, the system
of Vienna, the system of Versailles, the system of Yalta-Potsdam and later
international relations were transformed into bipolarity one. Since demolishing
classical Cold War order and entering into new epoch of anarchic scenario, the
states as key actors of the system have been diminishing in favour of so-called “nonstate actors”. However, in the international system of the 21st century, the nationstate still has particular functions. It represents the dominant element of the world
politics which can influence the behaviour of the population and non-state actors.