Comparison between outcomes of small head and large head prosthesis use in total hip arthroplasty

V. Mittal, C. Pal, Hemant Chahar, A. Sadana, Ashutosh Verma, Jeetesh V. Patel
{"title":"Comparison between outcomes of small head and large head prosthesis use in total hip arthroplasty","authors":"V. Mittal, C. Pal, Hemant Chahar, A. Sadana, Ashutosh Verma, Jeetesh V. Patel","doi":"10.4103/jbjd.jbjd_15_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Total hip replacement (THR) currently uses a various size of head and bearing. These days the most common head diameter used in the THR is 32 mm. The purpose of our study is to compare the functional and radiographic evaluation of outcomes of two groups of patients undergoing the THR, received either small diameter (≤28 mm) or large diameter (≥32 mm) femoral head prosthesis. Materials and Methods: This was an interventional prospective study done between September 2018 and August 2020. The diameter of femoral head sizes 32 mm and 28 mm was used in this study. At definite intervals, patients were regularly followed and specifically assessed for functional and radiographic evaluation. Results: During follow-up of patients with 32-mm femoral head diameter excellent functional results were achieved as graded by Harris hip score (P < 0.0001). No patients showed any complications in the large diameter femoral head group. Conclusions: Large femoral head diameter prosthesis may lead to more stability, range of motion, wear rate, and reducing the complications of revision surgery, but with small diameter femoral head, there is an increased chance of dislocation, impingement, and more complications.","PeriodicalId":232675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Diseases","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jbjd.jbjd_15_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Total hip replacement (THR) currently uses a various size of head and bearing. These days the most common head diameter used in the THR is 32 mm. The purpose of our study is to compare the functional and radiographic evaluation of outcomes of two groups of patients undergoing the THR, received either small diameter (≤28 mm) or large diameter (≥32 mm) femoral head prosthesis. Materials and Methods: This was an interventional prospective study done between September 2018 and August 2020. The diameter of femoral head sizes 32 mm and 28 mm was used in this study. At definite intervals, patients were regularly followed and specifically assessed for functional and radiographic evaluation. Results: During follow-up of patients with 32-mm femoral head diameter excellent functional results were achieved as graded by Harris hip score (P < 0.0001). No patients showed any complications in the large diameter femoral head group. Conclusions: Large femoral head diameter prosthesis may lead to more stability, range of motion, wear rate, and reducing the complications of revision surgery, but with small diameter femoral head, there is an increased chance of dislocation, impingement, and more complications.
全髋关节置换术中使用小头与大头假体的效果比较
介绍:全髋关节置换术(THR)目前使用各种尺寸的头部和轴承。这些天在THR中使用的最常见的头部直径是32毫米。本研究的目的是比较两组接受小直径(≤28 mm)或大直径(≥32 mm)股骨头假体的患者的功能和影像学评价结果。材料和方法:这是一项介入性前瞻性研究,于2018年9月至2020年8月完成。股骨头直径分别为32 mm和28 mm。在确定的时间间隔内,对患者进行定期随访,并对其进行功能和放射学评估。结果:随访期间,32 mm股骨头直径患者的Harris髋关节评分评分均达到良好的功能效果(P < 0.0001)。大直径股骨头组无并发症发生。结论:大股骨头直径假体具有更好的稳定性、活动范围、磨损率,减少翻修手术并发症,但小股骨头直径假体脱位、撞击的可能性增加,并发症增多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书