Engine Mounting Systems for Electric Powertrains: Mounting Layouts and Design Parameters

S. Kaul
{"title":"Engine Mounting Systems for Electric Powertrains: Mounting Layouts and Design Parameters","authors":"S. Kaul","doi":"10.1115/imece2022-87646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The vibroacoustic characteristics of electric powertrains are well known to significantly differ from internal combustion engines. A relatively very high power-to-torque density makes a three-phase permanent-magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) very appealing for electric powertrains, but its electromagnetic characteristics typically result in high frequency noise and vibration. While the vibration response in internal combustion engines is generally evaluated up to 100 Hz, electric drive trains are known to exhibit a response ranging from 1 to 10 kHz. As a result, multiple studies in the recent literature have investigated several designs for engine mounting systems that could be used to address some of the specific issues such as internal resonances, wave effects, high frequency noise and vibration, etc. It has been widely reported in the literature that force transmissibility and noise radiation can be significantly underestimated at relatively higher frequencies without directly modeling the inertial properties of the engine mounting system. Some of the mounting system layouts that have been investigated in the literature include the three-point or four-point saddle mounting configurations, the cradle type pendulum mounting configuration, etc. This paper performs a comparative analysis for a few of the commonly used mounting system layouts to identify the pros and cons of the design strategies specifically aimed at vibration mitigation in electric powertrains. A spatial model that has been previously validated is used to compare three different mounting system layouts. Since viscoelastic properties are known to exhibit a strong influence from excitation frequencies, the spatial model that has been used in this study incorporates the properties that are associated with high frequency response of the engine mounting system. Force transmissibility plots are used to evaluate the mounting layouts and specific design parameters associated with the engine mounting system. Results indicate that the four-point saddle mounting configuration provides a good balance between transmissibility at low frequencies and high frequencies. Models presented in this study can be used to determine an optimal mounting configuration for an electric powertrain.","PeriodicalId":302047,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5: Dynamics, Vibration, and Control","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5: Dynamics, Vibration, and Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2022-87646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The vibroacoustic characteristics of electric powertrains are well known to significantly differ from internal combustion engines. A relatively very high power-to-torque density makes a three-phase permanent-magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) very appealing for electric powertrains, but its electromagnetic characteristics typically result in high frequency noise and vibration. While the vibration response in internal combustion engines is generally evaluated up to 100 Hz, electric drive trains are known to exhibit a response ranging from 1 to 10 kHz. As a result, multiple studies in the recent literature have investigated several designs for engine mounting systems that could be used to address some of the specific issues such as internal resonances, wave effects, high frequency noise and vibration, etc. It has been widely reported in the literature that force transmissibility and noise radiation can be significantly underestimated at relatively higher frequencies without directly modeling the inertial properties of the engine mounting system. Some of the mounting system layouts that have been investigated in the literature include the three-point or four-point saddle mounting configurations, the cradle type pendulum mounting configuration, etc. This paper performs a comparative analysis for a few of the commonly used mounting system layouts to identify the pros and cons of the design strategies specifically aimed at vibration mitigation in electric powertrains. A spatial model that has been previously validated is used to compare three different mounting system layouts. Since viscoelastic properties are known to exhibit a strong influence from excitation frequencies, the spatial model that has been used in this study incorporates the properties that are associated with high frequency response of the engine mounting system. Force transmissibility plots are used to evaluate the mounting layouts and specific design parameters associated with the engine mounting system. Results indicate that the four-point saddle mounting configuration provides a good balance between transmissibility at low frequencies and high frequencies. Models presented in this study can be used to determine an optimal mounting configuration for an electric powertrain.
电动动力总成的发动机安装系统:安装布局和设计参数
众所周知,电动动力系统的振动声学特性与内燃机有很大的不同。相对较高的功率转矩密度使得三相永磁同步电机(PMSM)对电动动力系统非常有吸引力,但其电磁特性通常会导致高频噪声和振动。虽然内燃机的振动响应通常评估为100赫兹,但已知电动传动系统的响应范围为1至10 kHz。因此,在最近的文献中,多项研究调查了发动机悬置系统的几种设计,这些设计可用于解决一些特定问题,如内部共振、波效应、高频噪声和振动等。文献中已经广泛报道,在相对较高的频率下,力传递率和噪声辐射可以显著低估,而无需直接对发动机悬置系统的惯性特性进行建模。文献中研究的一些安装系统布局包括三点或四点鞍座安装配置,摇篮式摆摆安装配置等。本文对几种常用的安装系统布局进行了比较分析,以确定针对电动动力系统减振的设计策略的优缺点。之前验证过的空间模型用于比较三种不同的安装系统布局。由于已知粘弹性特性会受到激励频率的强烈影响,因此本研究中使用的空间模型包含了与发动机悬置系统高频响应相关的特性。力传递率图用于评估与发动机安装系统相关的安装布局和具体设计参数。结果表明,四点鞍座安装结构在低频和高频传输率之间提供了良好的平衡。本研究中提出的模型可用于确定电动动力总成的最佳安装配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信