Declaration Of Understanding Radicalism To Islam (Critical Analysis of Islamic Religious Educational Materials in Response to Allegations of Understanding Radicalism to Muslims)

Lalu Gede Muhammad Zainuddin Atsani, Ulyan Nasri
{"title":"Declaration Of Understanding Radicalism To Islam (Critical Analysis of Islamic Religious Educational Materials in Response to Allegations of Understanding Radicalism to Muslims)","authors":"Lalu Gede Muhammad Zainuddin Atsani, Ulyan Nasri","doi":"10.37329/kamaya.v4i3.1411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to critically analyze or re-measure Islamic religious education materials in countering accusations of radicalism to Muslims. The term radicalism has become a familiar term attached to a group in Islam. Indicators to call groups in Islam radicalism to include terrorism, anarchists, rebels, and extremists. The research method uses a descriptive type of research. The results of this study are one of the causes of the trapping of elements in radicalism, namely a partial understanding of religion and tends to the nature of fanaticism. This trait then results in a sense of superiority over followers of other religions. Failing to understand the concept of jihad in religion makes someone take a shortcut by spreading terror to innocent people. the logical consequence of this interpretation is the juxtaposition of terrorism as the fruit of radicalism. This hypothesis is reasonable, considering that various terrorist activities in various parts of the world always act in the name of jihad carried out by Muslims as a form of obedience to God. This has led to various upheavals which, without realizing it, will not only have implications for the decline in national stability. However, it even sparked a negative response from various parts of the world. Therefore, it is necessary to have an inclusive understanding of religion so that religious adherents realize that plurality is a necessity. Seeing these problems, there needs to be a strengthening and reaffirmation of the originality of Islamic teachings that contain humanist pluralistic and tolerant values. The conclusion is that a very strategic role, in this case, is that Islamic religious education materials must be able to reconstruct relevant materials to counteract accusations of radicalism. It is at this point that the focus of the study in this article is trying to critically analyze or re-measure Islamic religious education materials that tend to be humanist-pluralist and tolerant to ward off accusations of radicalism in Islam.","PeriodicalId":372927,"journal":{"name":"Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37329/kamaya.v4i3.1411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to critically analyze or re-measure Islamic religious education materials in countering accusations of radicalism to Muslims. The term radicalism has become a familiar term attached to a group in Islam. Indicators to call groups in Islam radicalism to include terrorism, anarchists, rebels, and extremists. The research method uses a descriptive type of research. The results of this study are one of the causes of the trapping of elements in radicalism, namely a partial understanding of religion and tends to the nature of fanaticism. This trait then results in a sense of superiority over followers of other religions. Failing to understand the concept of jihad in religion makes someone take a shortcut by spreading terror to innocent people. the logical consequence of this interpretation is the juxtaposition of terrorism as the fruit of radicalism. This hypothesis is reasonable, considering that various terrorist activities in various parts of the world always act in the name of jihad carried out by Muslims as a form of obedience to God. This has led to various upheavals which, without realizing it, will not only have implications for the decline in national stability. However, it even sparked a negative response from various parts of the world. Therefore, it is necessary to have an inclusive understanding of religion so that religious adherents realize that plurality is a necessity. Seeing these problems, there needs to be a strengthening and reaffirmation of the originality of Islamic teachings that contain humanist pluralistic and tolerant values. The conclusion is that a very strategic role, in this case, is that Islamic religious education materials must be able to reconstruct relevant materials to counteract accusations of radicalism. It is at this point that the focus of the study in this article is trying to critically analyze or re-measure Islamic religious education materials that tend to be humanist-pluralist and tolerant to ward off accusations of radicalism in Islam.
《理解伊斯兰激进主义宣言》(对伊斯兰宗教教育材料的批判性分析——对理解穆斯林激进主义指控的回应)
本研究的目的是批判性地分析或重新衡量伊斯兰宗教教育材料,以反对对穆斯林的激进主义指控。激进主义这个词已经成为一个与伊斯兰教中的一个团体联系在一起的熟悉的术语。伊斯兰激进主义包括恐怖主义、无政府主义、反叛者和极端主义。研究方法采用描述性研究。本研究的结果是激进主义被困的原因之一,即对宗教的片面理解,倾向于狂热的本质。这一特点导致了对其他宗教信徒的优越感。如果不理解宗教中的圣战概念,就会走捷径,把恐怖传播给无辜的人。这种解释的逻辑结果是将恐怖主义与激进主义的产物并置。这个假设是合理的,因为世界各地的各种恐怖活动总是以穆斯林圣战的名义进行的,这是对上帝的一种服从。这导致了各种动荡,这些动荡在没有意识到的情况下,不仅会影响到国家稳定的下降。然而,它甚至引发了世界各地的负面反应。因此,有必要对宗教有一个包容的认识,使信教者认识到多元化是必要的。看到这些问题,就需要加强和重申包含人道主义多元化和宽容价值观的伊斯兰教义的原创性。结论是,在这种情况下,一个非常具有战略意义的作用是,伊斯兰宗教教育材料必须能够重建相关材料,以抵消对激进主义的指责。正是在这一点上,本文的研究重点是试图批判性地分析或重新衡量伊斯兰宗教教育材料,这些材料往往是人文主义-多元主义和宽容的,以避免对伊斯兰教激进主义的指责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信