An Indicator for National Systems of Innovation: Methodology and Application to 17 Industrialized Countries

H. Belitz, M. Clemens, C. von Hirschhausen, Jens Schmidt-Ehmcke, A. Werwatz, P. Zloczysti
{"title":"An Indicator for National Systems of Innovation: Methodology and Application to 17 Industrialized Countries","authors":"H. Belitz, M. Clemens, C. von Hirschhausen, Jens Schmidt-Ehmcke, A. Werwatz, P. Zloczysti","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1858751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We develop a composite indicator measuring the performance of national innovation systems. The indicator takes into account both \"hard\" factors that are quantifiable (such as R&D spending, number of patents) and \"soft\" factors like the assessment of preconditions for innovation by managers. We apply the methodology to a set of 17 industrialized countries on a yearly basis between 2007 and 2009. The indicator combines results from public opinion surveys on the process of change, social capital, trust and science and technology to achieve an assessment of a country's social climate for innovation. After calculating and ranking the innovation indictor scores for the 17 countries, we group them into three classes: innovation leader, middle group and end section. Using multiple sensitivity analysis approaches, we show that the indicator reacts robustly to different weights within these country groups. While leading countries like Switzerland, the USA and the Nordic countries have an innovation system with high scores and ranks in every sub indicator, the middle group consisting among others of Germany Japan, the UK and France, can be characterized by higher variation within ranks. In the end section, countries like Italy and Spain have bad scores for almost all indicators.","PeriodicalId":210610,"journal":{"name":"Public Sector Strategy & Organizational Behavior eJournal","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Sector Strategy & Organizational Behavior eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1858751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

We develop a composite indicator measuring the performance of national innovation systems. The indicator takes into account both "hard" factors that are quantifiable (such as R&D spending, number of patents) and "soft" factors like the assessment of preconditions for innovation by managers. We apply the methodology to a set of 17 industrialized countries on a yearly basis between 2007 and 2009. The indicator combines results from public opinion surveys on the process of change, social capital, trust and science and technology to achieve an assessment of a country's social climate for innovation. After calculating and ranking the innovation indictor scores for the 17 countries, we group them into three classes: innovation leader, middle group and end section. Using multiple sensitivity analysis approaches, we show that the indicator reacts robustly to different weights within these country groups. While leading countries like Switzerland, the USA and the Nordic countries have an innovation system with high scores and ranks in every sub indicator, the middle group consisting among others of Germany Japan, the UK and France, can be characterized by higher variation within ranks. In the end section, countries like Italy and Spain have bad scores for almost all indicators.
国家创新系统指标:方法及其在17个工业化国家的应用
我们开发了一个衡量国家创新系统绩效的综合指标。该指标既考虑了可量化的“硬”因素(如研发支出、专利数量),也考虑了“软”因素,如管理者对创新先决条件的评估。我们将该方法应用于2007年至2009年间17个工业化国家的年度基础上。该指标综合了关于变革过程、社会资本、信任和科学技术的民意调查结果,以评估一个国家的社会创新环境。在对17个国家的创新指标得分进行计算和排名后,我们将它们分为三类:创新领先者、中间组和末端组。使用多重敏感性分析方法,我们发现该指标对这些国家组内不同权重的反应非常强烈。虽然瑞士、美国和北欧国家等领先国家的创新体系在每个子指标上都有很高的得分和排名,但德国、日本、英国和法国等中等国家的排名差异较大。在最后一节,意大利和西班牙等国几乎在所有指标上都得分很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信