Approaches and Methodologies to Support Critical Reflection

J. Callens
{"title":"Approaches and Methodologies to Support Critical Reflection","authors":"J. Callens","doi":"10.38069/edenconf-2019-ac-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During their studies, pre-service teachers are continually asked to reflect (Calderhead Gates, 1993; Korthagen Vasalos, 2005; Rodgers, 2002). In teacher education a goal of reflection is to change beliefs about teaching in order to improve practice, and therefore there is a strong connection between reflection and actions of students on the workplace. It does not seem obvious that students in teacher education reach a critical level in their reflections (Bean Stevens, 2002). According to Bean and Stevens (2002) effective scaffolding of a reflection process encompasses a number of key features within cognitive and emotional domains. Cognitive features include for instance using hints and leading questions to develop self-regulation. Emotional features include for instance providing a safety net to allow for mistakes. In this study we focus on cognitive features and search for an approach/methodology that may support a reflection process.","PeriodicalId":315718,"journal":{"name":"EDEN Conference Proceedings","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDEN Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38069/edenconf-2019-ac-0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During their studies, pre-service teachers are continually asked to reflect (Calderhead Gates, 1993; Korthagen Vasalos, 2005; Rodgers, 2002). In teacher education a goal of reflection is to change beliefs about teaching in order to improve practice, and therefore there is a strong connection between reflection and actions of students on the workplace. It does not seem obvious that students in teacher education reach a critical level in their reflections (Bean Stevens, 2002). According to Bean and Stevens (2002) effective scaffolding of a reflection process encompasses a number of key features within cognitive and emotional domains. Cognitive features include for instance using hints and leading questions to develop self-regulation. Emotional features include for instance providing a safety net to allow for mistakes. In this study we focus on cognitive features and search for an approach/methodology that may support a reflection process.
支持批判性反思的方法和方法
在学习过程中,职前教师不断被要求反思(Calderhead Gates, 1993;Korthagen Vasalos, 2005;罗杰斯,2002)。在教师教育中,反思的目标是改变对教学的信念,以改进实践,因此,反思与学生在工作场所的行动之间存在很强的联系。教师教育的学生在反思中达到临界水平似乎并不明显(Bean Stevens, 2002)。根据Bean和Stevens(2002)的观点,反思过程的有效框架包含了认知和情感领域的一些关键特征。认知特征包括使用提示和引导问题来发展自我调节。情感特征包括提供一个允许犯错的安全网。在这项研究中,我们关注认知特征,并寻找一种可能支持反思过程的方法/方法论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信