Hambatan Pelaksanaan SEMA No. 2 Tahun 2019 terhadap Pemenuhan Hak-hak Perempuan Pasca Cerai Gugat di Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Kediri

Moch Ichwan Kurniawan, Nurul Hanani, Rezki Suci Qamaria
{"title":"Hambatan Pelaksanaan SEMA No. 2 Tahun 2019 terhadap Pemenuhan Hak-hak Perempuan Pasca Cerai Gugat di Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Kediri","authors":"Moch Ichwan Kurniawan, Nurul Hanani, Rezki Suci Qamaria","doi":"10.21154/syakhsiyyah.v4i1.3962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SEMA No. 2 of 2019 which accommodates SEMA No. 3 of 2018 and PERMA No. 3 of 2017 concerning guidelines for adjudicating women's cases in conflict with the law makes new legal protection for women seeking justice, including for divorced wives. Where it allows a divorced wife to ask for her rights after the divorce is sued, namely iddah living and mut'ah income. This rule serves as a guide for judges under the Supreme Court including the Religious Courts of Kediri Regency, but in its implementation, it has not been in accordance with the purpose of the presence of these rules, the focus of this research is to explore the inhibiting factors for the implementation of SEMA No. The Religious Court of Kediri Regency and the solution given by the judge to the divorced wife due to the husband's fault. The results of this study show that the inhibiting factor is the absence of the divorced husband which causes the rules to not be implemented, the absence of instructions from the chairman of the court that requires applying SEMA No. 2 of 2019, and the lack of knowledge of divorced wives about the law. The solution is to present the husband in court so that it can be considered by the judge to decide the divorce case as possible, and the judge also tries to make husband and wife get back together in the household. Because the essence of the Religious Courts is a place to repair husband-wife relationships that experience cracks in the household.","PeriodicalId":105453,"journal":{"name":"Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law & Family Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law & Family Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21154/syakhsiyyah.v4i1.3962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SEMA No. 2 of 2019 which accommodates SEMA No. 3 of 2018 and PERMA No. 3 of 2017 concerning guidelines for adjudicating women's cases in conflict with the law makes new legal protection for women seeking justice, including for divorced wives. Where it allows a divorced wife to ask for her rights after the divorce is sued, namely iddah living and mut'ah income. This rule serves as a guide for judges under the Supreme Court including the Religious Courts of Kediri Regency, but in its implementation, it has not been in accordance with the purpose of the presence of these rules, the focus of this research is to explore the inhibiting factors for the implementation of SEMA No. The Religious Court of Kediri Regency and the solution given by the judge to the divorced wife due to the husband's fault. The results of this study show that the inhibiting factor is the absence of the divorced husband which causes the rules to not be implemented, the absence of instructions from the chairman of the court that requires applying SEMA No. 2 of 2019, and the lack of knowledge of divorced wives about the law. The solution is to present the husband in court so that it can be considered by the judge to decide the divorce case as possible, and the judge also tries to make husband and wife get back together in the household. Because the essence of the Religious Courts is a place to repair husband-wife relationships that experience cracks in the household.
2019年2年的执行障碍,反对Kediri县宗教法庭离婚后妇女权利的履行
2019年第2号SEMA包含了2018年第3号SEMA和2017年第3号PERMA,其中涉及裁决违反法律的妇女案件的准则,为寻求正义的妇女提供了新的法律保护,包括对离婚妻子的保护。它允许离婚的妻子在离婚诉讼后要求她的权利,即iddah生活和mut'ah收入。该规则对包括Kediri Regency的宗教法院在内的最高法院的法官具有指导作用,但在其实施中,并没有符合这些规则存在的目的,本研究的重点是探讨SEMA第1号实施的抑制因素。Kediri Regency的宗教法庭和法官对因丈夫过错而离婚的妻子的解决方案。本研究结果表明,制约因素是离婚丈夫的缺席导致规则无法执行,法院院长没有指示要求适用2019年第2号SEMA,离婚妻子缺乏法律知识。解决的办法是把丈夫带到法庭上,这样法官就可以考虑尽可能地决定离婚案件,法官也会努力让丈夫和妻子在家庭中重聚。因为宗教法庭的本质是一个修复夫妻关系的地方因为夫妻关系在家庭中出现了裂痕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信