Social Optimum, Heterogeneous Workers and Firms in the Labour Market with On-the-Job-Search

Erdenebulgan Damdinsuren
{"title":"Social Optimum, Heterogeneous Workers and Firms in the Labour Market with On-the-Job-Search","authors":"Erdenebulgan Damdinsuren","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3772844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper develops a search model with heterogeneous workers, firms, and on-the-job search. Employed low-skilled workers are allowed to seek better paid jobs at high productivity firms. Low productivity firms make take-it-or-leave-it wage offers, whereas high-productivity firms use Nash bargaining over wages. There are two important sources of inefficiency in the model besides the well-known classical search externality. First, low-skilled workers do not have any bargaining power when they are employed at low productivity firms. Second, the two types of workers are pooled in the same submarket. We demonstrate that lump-sum transfers paid to workers can internalize these inefficiencies. Moreover, both types of firms may benefit from the increase in the supply of low-skilled workers when the productivity difference in the two jobs for these workers is large, as a result the overall wage gap among workers increase. On the contrary, when the productivity difference is small, the effects are reversed. Finally, both types of firms emerge in the equilibrium when firms are allowed to open vacancies in both submarkets. On the one hand, it is attractive for firms to open vacancies in the low productivity submarket since they pay low wages to workers. On the other hand, it is also profitable for firms to open vacancies in the high productivity submarket because the probability of jobs being filled with low-skilled workers increase significantly, even though the bargained wages of high-skilled workers increase.","PeriodicalId":400873,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Information","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3772844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper develops a search model with heterogeneous workers, firms, and on-the-job search. Employed low-skilled workers are allowed to seek better paid jobs at high productivity firms. Low productivity firms make take-it-or-leave-it wage offers, whereas high-productivity firms use Nash bargaining over wages. There are two important sources of inefficiency in the model besides the well-known classical search externality. First, low-skilled workers do not have any bargaining power when they are employed at low productivity firms. Second, the two types of workers are pooled in the same submarket. We demonstrate that lump-sum transfers paid to workers can internalize these inefficiencies. Moreover, both types of firms may benefit from the increase in the supply of low-skilled workers when the productivity difference in the two jobs for these workers is large, as a result the overall wage gap among workers increase. On the contrary, when the productivity difference is small, the effects are reversed. Finally, both types of firms emerge in the equilibrium when firms are allowed to open vacancies in both submarkets. On the one hand, it is attractive for firms to open vacancies in the low productivity submarket since they pay low wages to workers. On the other hand, it is also profitable for firms to open vacancies in the high productivity submarket because the probability of jobs being filled with low-skilled workers increase significantly, even though the bargained wages of high-skilled workers increase.
社会最优、异质性工人和企业在就业市场中的寻找
本文建立了一个包含异质性员工、企业和在职搜索的搜索模型。被雇佣的低技能工人被允许在高生产率的公司寻找报酬更高的工作。低生产率企业的工资是“要么接受要么放弃”,而高生产率企业在工资问题上使用纳什议价。除了众所周知的经典搜索外部性外,该模型中还有两个重要的低效率来源。首先,低技能工人在低生产率企业工作时没有任何议价能力。第二,这两种类型的工人集中在同一个子市场。我们证明,向工人支付的一次性转移支付可以将这些低效率内部化。此外,当两种工作的生产率差异很大时,两种类型的企业都可能从低技能工人供给的增加中受益,从而导致工人之间的总体工资差距增加。相反,当生产力差异较小时,效果正好相反。最后,当企业被允许在两个次级市场中开放职位空缺时,这两种类型的企业都会出现在均衡中。一方面,对公司来说,在低生产率的子市场上开放职位是有吸引力的,因为他们付给工人的工资很低。另一方面,企业在高生产率子市场上开放职位空缺也是有利可图的,因为即使高技能工人的议价工资增加,低技能工人填补职位的可能性也会显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信