Penerapan Self Asessment System Bea Perolehan Hak atas Tanah Bangunan dalam Transaksi Jual Beli

Rahayu Harina, Busyra Azheri, Yussy Adelina Mannas
{"title":"Penerapan Self Asessment System Bea Perolehan Hak atas Tanah Bangunan dalam Transaksi Jual Beli","authors":"Rahayu Harina, Busyra Azheri, Yussy Adelina Mannas","doi":"10.18196/mls.v4i2.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to Law Number 1 of 2022 concerning Financial Relations between the Central Government and Regional Governments, it is stated that the BPHTB collection is calculated and paid by the taxpayer himself, in the sense that the BPHTB adheres to a self-assessment system collection system. The essential imposition of BPHTB based on the Regional Regulation of Agam Agency Number 7 of 2011 concerning Regional Tax states that the basis for the imposition of BPHTB for a sale and purchase transaction of land or buildings is the transaction value, which is the transaction value here according to the elucidation of Law Number 20 of 2000 concerning Acquisition Fees. The values that occur and are agreed upon by the parties involved are land and building rights. However, in reality, BEKEUDA in Agam Regency is more dominant in using market prices. This study aims to analyze and answer questions from the formulation of the problem, namely how is the application of the principles of the self-assessment system at BPHTB in buying and selling transactions of land and/or buildings in Agam Regency, what is the basis for determining the sale and purchase price of land and/or buildings at BPHTB by BAKEUDA of Agam Regency, what is the legal certainty regarding the determination of the sale and purchase price set by BAKEUDA of Agam Regency. The approach method in this study is empirical-juridical, and the specifications used in this study are analytical-descriptive. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that, the application of the principle of a self-assessment system is not purely following the mandate of the law. The considerations that determine the value of the buying and selling price by BAKEUDA are the results of previous verification, the opinion of the nagari guardian, the opinion of the community shop, and the price on the marketplace on social media. The legal certainty regarding the determination of the sale and purchase price is not yet strong and certain.","PeriodicalId":272345,"journal":{"name":"Media of Law and Sharia","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media of Law and Sharia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v4i2.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to Law Number 1 of 2022 concerning Financial Relations between the Central Government and Regional Governments, it is stated that the BPHTB collection is calculated and paid by the taxpayer himself, in the sense that the BPHTB adheres to a self-assessment system collection system. The essential imposition of BPHTB based on the Regional Regulation of Agam Agency Number 7 of 2011 concerning Regional Tax states that the basis for the imposition of BPHTB for a sale and purchase transaction of land or buildings is the transaction value, which is the transaction value here according to the elucidation of Law Number 20 of 2000 concerning Acquisition Fees. The values that occur and are agreed upon by the parties involved are land and building rights. However, in reality, BEKEUDA in Agam Regency is more dominant in using market prices. This study aims to analyze and answer questions from the formulation of the problem, namely how is the application of the principles of the self-assessment system at BPHTB in buying and selling transactions of land and/or buildings in Agam Regency, what is the basis for determining the sale and purchase price of land and/or buildings at BPHTB by BAKEUDA of Agam Regency, what is the legal certainty regarding the determination of the sale and purchase price set by BAKEUDA of Agam Regency. The approach method in this study is empirical-juridical, and the specifications used in this study are analytical-descriptive. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that, the application of the principle of a self-assessment system is not purely following the mandate of the law. The considerations that determine the value of the buying and selling price by BAKEUDA are the results of previous verification, the opinion of the nagari guardian, the opinion of the community shop, and the price on the marketplace on social media. The legal certainty regarding the determination of the sale and purchase price is not yet strong and certain.
根据关于中央政府和地方政府财政关系的2022年第1号法律,BPHTB的征收由纳税人自己计算和支付,从某种意义上说,BPHTB遵循自我评估系统征收系统。根据2011年关于地区税的第7号Agam机构区域条例征收BPHTB的基本规定,对土地或建筑物的买卖交易征收BPHTB的依据是交易价值,根据2000年关于收购费的第20号法律的阐明,这里的交易价值是交易价值。发生并经当事人同意的价值是土地和建筑权利。然而,在现实中,BEKEUDA在Agam Regency更倾向于使用市场价格。本研究旨在分析和回答问题的制定问题,即如何自我评估的原则的应用系统在BPHTB买卖交易的土地和/或建筑物Agam摄政,什么是确定买卖价格的基础的土地和/或建筑BPHTB BAKEUDA Agam摄政,什么是法律确定性的决心的买卖价格BAKEUDA Agam摄政。本研究的研究方法是经验-法律,而本研究使用的规范是分析-描述。根据研究结果,可以得出结论,自我评估制度原则的适用并非纯粹遵循法律的授权。决定百田买卖价格价值的考虑因素是事先验证的结果、nagari监护人的意见、社区商店的意见以及社交媒体上市场的价格。关于买卖价格确定的法律确定性还不够强和确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信