Ketidaktepatan Kode Diagnosis Kasus Neoplasma Menggunakan ICD-10 Di RSUP H.Adam Malik Medan Tahun 2019

Johanna Christy, Evi Efriamta Siagian
{"title":"Ketidaktepatan Kode Diagnosis Kasus Neoplasma Menggunakan ICD-10 Di RSUP H.Adam Malik Medan Tahun 2019","authors":"Johanna Christy, Evi Efriamta Siagian","doi":"10.2411/JIPIKI.V6I1.477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRAK \n                Informasi peyakit dirumah sakit tidak akan lengkap dan bermanfaat apabila belum diolah, maka untuk itu perlu dilakukan pengkodean. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui ketepatan kode diagnosis pada kasus neoplasma menggunakan ICD-10 di RSUP. H. Adam Malik tahun 2019. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan pendekatan cross sectional, Jumlah sampel yang digunakan sebanyak 93 dokumen dan 4 orang responden. Ketepatan kode morfologi diagnosis neoplasma diperoleh hasil 88 (95%) kode tepat 6 karakter, 0 (0%) kode tepat 5 karakter, 0 (0%) kode tepat 4 karakter, 3 (3%) kode tidak tepat sama sekali dan 2 (2%) tidak dikode. Ketepatan kode topografi diperoleh hasil 79 (85%) kode tepat 4 karakter, 8 (9%) kode tepat 3 karakter, 4 (4%) kode tepat 2 karakter, 0 (0%) kode tepat 1 karakter, 0 (0%) kode tidak tepat sama sekali dan 0 (0%) kode tidak dikerjakan. Faktor yang menjadi penyebab ketidaktepatan dalam pengodean adalah petugas coding sulit untuk membaca tulisan dokter sehingga penulis menyarankan sebaiknya dalam pengkodingan diagnosis tetap mengikuti kaidah dan aturan yang ada pada ICD-10. \n  \nKata Kunci: Ketepatan, Diagnosis, Neoplasma, Pengkodean \n  \n  \nAbstract \nInformation for patients in hospitals will not be complete and useful if it has not been processed, so coding is necessary. This study aims to determine the accuracy of the diagnosis code in cases of neoplasm using ICD-10 in RSUP. H. Adam Malik in 2019. This study used a quantitative method with a cross sectional approach. The number of samples used was 93 documents and 4 respondents. The accuracy of the morphological code for the diagnosis of neoplasm was 88 (95%) the code was exactly 6 characters, 0 (0%) the code was exactly 5 characters, 0 (0%) the code was exactly 4 characters, 3 (3%) the code was not correct at all and 2 ( 2%) is not coded. The accuracy of the topographic code is 79 (85%) the code is exactly 4 characters, 8 (9%) the code is exactly 3 characters, 4 (4%) the code is exactly 2 characters, 0 (0%) the code is exactly 1 character, 0 (0%) code is not correct at all and code 0 (0%) is not working. The factor that caused the inaccuracy in coding was that it was difficult for coding officers to read the doctor's writings, so the authors suggested that the coding of the diagnosis should still follow the rules and regulations in the ICD-10. \n  \nKeywords: Accuracy, Diagnosis, Neoplasm, Encoding","PeriodicalId":261208,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Perekam dan Informasi Kesehatan Imelda (JIPIKI)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Perekam dan Informasi Kesehatan Imelda (JIPIKI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2411/JIPIKI.V6I1.477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRAK                 Informasi peyakit dirumah sakit tidak akan lengkap dan bermanfaat apabila belum diolah, maka untuk itu perlu dilakukan pengkodean. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui ketepatan kode diagnosis pada kasus neoplasma menggunakan ICD-10 di RSUP. H. Adam Malik tahun 2019. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan pendekatan cross sectional, Jumlah sampel yang digunakan sebanyak 93 dokumen dan 4 orang responden. Ketepatan kode morfologi diagnosis neoplasma diperoleh hasil 88 (95%) kode tepat 6 karakter, 0 (0%) kode tepat 5 karakter, 0 (0%) kode tepat 4 karakter, 3 (3%) kode tidak tepat sama sekali dan 2 (2%) tidak dikode. Ketepatan kode topografi diperoleh hasil 79 (85%) kode tepat 4 karakter, 8 (9%) kode tepat 3 karakter, 4 (4%) kode tepat 2 karakter, 0 (0%) kode tepat 1 karakter, 0 (0%) kode tidak tepat sama sekali dan 0 (0%) kode tidak dikerjakan. Faktor yang menjadi penyebab ketidaktepatan dalam pengodean adalah petugas coding sulit untuk membaca tulisan dokter sehingga penulis menyarankan sebaiknya dalam pengkodingan diagnosis tetap mengikuti kaidah dan aturan yang ada pada ICD-10.   Kata Kunci: Ketepatan, Diagnosis, Neoplasma, Pengkodean     Abstract Information for patients in hospitals will not be complete and useful if it has not been processed, so coding is necessary. This study aims to determine the accuracy of the diagnosis code in cases of neoplasm using ICD-10 in RSUP. H. Adam Malik in 2019. This study used a quantitative method with a cross sectional approach. The number of samples used was 93 documents and 4 respondents. The accuracy of the morphological code for the diagnosis of neoplasm was 88 (95%) the code was exactly 6 characters, 0 (0%) the code was exactly 5 characters, 0 (0%) the code was exactly 4 characters, 3 (3%) the code was not correct at all and 2 ( 2%) is not coded. The accuracy of the topographic code is 79 (85%) the code is exactly 4 characters, 8 (9%) the code is exactly 3 characters, 4 (4%) the code is exactly 2 characters, 0 (0%) the code is exactly 1 character, 0 (0%) code is not correct at all and code 0 (0%) is not working. The factor that caused the inaccuracy in coding was that it was difficult for coding officers to read the doctor's writings, so the authors suggested that the coding of the diagnosis should still follow the rules and regulations in the ICD-10.   Keywords: Accuracy, Diagnosis, Neoplasm, Encoding
新血浆诊断代码的错误使用ICD-10在RSUP H.Adam Malik Medan在2019年
如果还没有准备好,医院里的信息就不完整,也不实用,因此需要进行编码。本研究的目的是利用RSUP中的ICD-10来确定新血浆病例的诊断代码的准确性。亚当·马利克2019年。该研究采用分段法的定量方法,共使用93份文件和4名受访者。正确的形态诊断诊断结果为88(95%)精确的6个字符,0(0%)精确的5个字符,0(0%)精确的4个字符,3(3%)错误的代码,2(2%)未编码。准确的地形编码得到79(85%)精确的代码4个字符,8(9%)精确的代码3个字符,4(4%)精确的代码2个字符,0(0%)精确代码1个字符,0(0%)代码不工作。造成编码错误的因素是,编码官员很难阅读医生的笔迹,因此作者建议在诊断过程中遵守ICD-10的规则和规则是明智的。关键词:准确性、诊断、新血浆、医院对病人的信息编码将不完整,如果没有处理,那么编码是必要的。这个研究是用来确定用ICD-10在RSUP上使用的新产前规范的准确结果的。2019年的亚当·马利克。这个研究用的是交叉引用的量量方法。使用的样本编号是93文档和4个响应器。《诊断》morphological代码为评比neoplasm是88(95%)代码是完全6 characters, 0(0%)《代码是完全characters, 5.0(0%)《圣经密码是强项4 characters, 3(3%)测量的代码是不准确的和2(2%)是coded音符。topographic评比》79(85%)是代码代码是完全4 characters, 8(9%)《圣经密码是强项3 characters, 4(4%)发布代码是完全2.0 characters,杂志》(0%)《圣经密码是强项1 character, 0(0%)测量的是音符的代码和代码0(0%)是短期音符。导致编码的准确原因是很难让官员读医生的文章,所以当局建议诊断的编码应该遵循ICD-10的规则和规定。计算:准确,诊断,新位置,编码
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书