Problem-Based Learning: A Case Study Demonstrating the Benefits of a Post-Freshman Summer Invention Program on Thermal Fluid Sciences Engagement and Professional Development

Andrew Kim, David Wootton
{"title":"Problem-Based Learning: A Case Study Demonstrating the Benefits of a Post-Freshman Summer Invention Program on Thermal Fluid Sciences Engagement and Professional Development","authors":"Andrew Kim, David Wootton","doi":"10.1115/imece2021-71354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Project-based learning (PBL) is a popular pedagogical strategy used in engineering education to improve students’ engagement, understanding, and soft skills. The thermal fluid sciences (TFS), including thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, and heat transfer, are infamously challenging core engineering subjects. TFS is traditionally taught through lectures, problem sets, and small projects starting in the second or third year of engineering curricula. However, pure PBL is often reserved for after students have completed the traditional courses. This case study follows a student who experienced a reversed pedagogy, wherein pure PBL instead of traditional lectures drove TFS education. In a summer invention program after the principal student’s first year, he invented a novel door fan that improved air circulation between adjacent rooms, even with the connecting door closed. He used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to simulate his invention. He then enrolled in a formal CFD class in his second year without taking prerequisite TFS courses. Afterward, the student enhanced the CFD simulations of his invention and wrote a technical paper on his results. This case study analyzes the pros and cons of the reversed pedagogy and the early timing of pure PBL through the principal student’s experience.","PeriodicalId":187039,"journal":{"name":"Volume 9: Engineering Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 9: Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-71354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Project-based learning (PBL) is a popular pedagogical strategy used in engineering education to improve students’ engagement, understanding, and soft skills. The thermal fluid sciences (TFS), including thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, and heat transfer, are infamously challenging core engineering subjects. TFS is traditionally taught through lectures, problem sets, and small projects starting in the second or third year of engineering curricula. However, pure PBL is often reserved for after students have completed the traditional courses. This case study follows a student who experienced a reversed pedagogy, wherein pure PBL instead of traditional lectures drove TFS education. In a summer invention program after the principal student’s first year, he invented a novel door fan that improved air circulation between adjacent rooms, even with the connecting door closed. He used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to simulate his invention. He then enrolled in a formal CFD class in his second year without taking prerequisite TFS courses. Afterward, the student enhanced the CFD simulations of his invention and wrote a technical paper on his results. This case study analyzes the pros and cons of the reversed pedagogy and the early timing of pure PBL through the principal student’s experience.
基于问题的学习:热流体科学参与和专业发展的新生后暑期发明计划的一个案例研究
基于项目的学习(PBL)是一种流行的教学策略,用于工程教育,以提高学生的参与,理解和软技能。热流体科学(TFS),包括热力学、流体力学和传热,是众所周知的具有挑战性的核心工程学科。TFS传统上是通过讲座、问题集和从工程课程的第二年或第三年开始的小项目来教授的。然而,纯粹的PBL通常是在学生完成传统课程后才进行的。本案例研究的对象是一名学生,他经历了一种相反的教学法,在这种教学法中,纯粹的PBL而不是传统的讲座推动了TFS教育。在校长一年级之后的暑期发明项目中,他发明了一种新颖的门扇,即使在连接的门关闭的情况下,也能改善相邻房间之间的空气流通。他用计算流体动力学(CFD)来模拟他的发明。然后,他在第二年注册了一个正式的CFD课程,没有参加先决条件的TFS课程。之后,该学生加强了他的发明的CFD模拟,并就他的结果写了一篇技术论文。本个案研究通过主要学生的经验分析了反向教学法和纯PBL早期时机的利弊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信