IP Quality: A New Model that Faces Methodology and Management Challenges

Kurt A. Wolf
{"title":"IP Quality: A New Model that Faces Methodology and Management Challenges","authors":"Kurt A. Wolf","doi":"10.1109/ISQED.2005.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given. The promised value and productivity from re-aggregating the IC design chain is not always delivered, in part because of isolated IP product development/quality related practices, and in part because of an inability, from a design management perspective, to see \"big picture\" issues in the IP marketplace. However these challenges are not insurmountable. The concern over IP quality has rightfully grown over the past years as the future growth of the IC industry depends on two factors; (a) achieving higher levels of design productivity; and (b) shifting internal resources towards creating and delivering value-added user benefits that stimulate increased end-product consumption. While the second factor is not discussed in this presentation, there is a presumption that higher IP quality and productivity enables a shift of resources to more application-oriented design. A pre-requisite to achieving the productivity gains is substantial improvements in the level of IP quality, coupled with increased forethought during product development. This presentation describes a methodology to evaluate IP for SoC integration. The focus is on development and quality verification practices that also account for the issues of IP integration. Additionally, the long-term growth of the semiconductor industry may be limited by the lack of value placed on collaboration, support, quality verification, and due diligence between SoC design teams and their IP partners. This presentation also describes improvements in the hard IP business relationship between these groups that enable dramatic growth through slight changes in communications models. By developing reasonable expectations and focusing on open discussion between each group, perspective begins to shift. The true value of the design team and IP partnership is a function of successful collaborations - not when the user squeezes the last drop out of NRE, royalty, per-use, or other financing models. And the value-add of the partnership is realized when that collaboration includes additional real, shared incentives that more fully value the IP industry, rather than focus on purely lowest cost.","PeriodicalId":302936,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISQED.2005.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary form only given. The promised value and productivity from re-aggregating the IC design chain is not always delivered, in part because of isolated IP product development/quality related practices, and in part because of an inability, from a design management perspective, to see "big picture" issues in the IP marketplace. However these challenges are not insurmountable. The concern over IP quality has rightfully grown over the past years as the future growth of the IC industry depends on two factors; (a) achieving higher levels of design productivity; and (b) shifting internal resources towards creating and delivering value-added user benefits that stimulate increased end-product consumption. While the second factor is not discussed in this presentation, there is a presumption that higher IP quality and productivity enables a shift of resources to more application-oriented design. A pre-requisite to achieving the productivity gains is substantial improvements in the level of IP quality, coupled with increased forethought during product development. This presentation describes a methodology to evaluate IP for SoC integration. The focus is on development and quality verification practices that also account for the issues of IP integration. Additionally, the long-term growth of the semiconductor industry may be limited by the lack of value placed on collaboration, support, quality verification, and due diligence between SoC design teams and their IP partners. This presentation also describes improvements in the hard IP business relationship between these groups that enable dramatic growth through slight changes in communications models. By developing reasonable expectations and focusing on open discussion between each group, perspective begins to shift. The true value of the design team and IP partnership is a function of successful collaborations - not when the user squeezes the last drop out of NRE, royalty, per-use, or other financing models. And the value-add of the partnership is realized when that collaboration includes additional real, shared incentives that more fully value the IP industry, rather than focus on purely lowest cost.
知识产权质量:面临方法论和管理挑战的新模式
只提供摘要形式。重新整合集成电路设计链所承诺的价值和生产力并不总是能够实现,部分原因是孤立的IP产品开发/质量相关实践,部分原因是从设计管理的角度来看,无法看到IP市场中的“大局”问题。然而,这些挑战并非不可克服。在过去的几年里,对IP质量的担忧理所当然地增长了,因为IC产业的未来增长取决于两个因素;(a)实现更高水平的设计生产力;(b)将内部资源转向创造和提供增值用户利益,以刺激终端产品消费的增加。虽然本文没有讨论第二个因素,但有一种假设认为,更高的IP质量和生产力可以将资源转移到更面向应用的设计上。实现生产力增益的先决条件是IP质量水平的实质性改进,以及在产品开发期间增加的预见性。本报告描述了一种评估SoC集成IP的方法。重点是开发和质量验证实践,这些实践也说明了IP集成的问题。此外,半导体行业的长期增长可能会受到SoC设计团队与其IP合作伙伴之间缺乏协作、支持、质量验证和尽职调查的限制。本演示还描述了这些组之间硬IP业务关系的改进,通过通信模型的细微变化实现了显著增长。通过建立合理的期望并专注于每个小组之间的公开讨论,观点开始转变。设计团队和IP伙伴关系的真正价值在于成功的合作,而不是用户从NRE、版税、按次使用或其他融资模式中榨取最后一笔钱。当这种合作包括额外的、真实的、共享的激励措施,更充分地重视知识产权行业,而不是仅仅关注最低成本时,这种伙伴关系的增值就会实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信