Exploitation of Offshore Transboundary Oil and Gas Reservoirs; an International Law Perspective

Patson W. Arinaitwe
{"title":"Exploitation of Offshore Transboundary Oil and Gas Reservoirs; an International Law Perspective","authors":"Patson W. Arinaitwe","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2486488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Under international law, state's territorial sovereignty ends at its boundaries and any hydrocarbons reservoirs that straddle across would belong to a different state with control over such territory. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) provides a legal framework for maritime boundary delimitation. However, it does not entirely solve the equation in regard to exploitation of cross-border hydrocarbons. What happens when the hydrocarbon cross boundaries of different states? It may be difficult to determine the quantity of hydrocarbons due to one state. Szekely defines trans boundary natural resources as those situated in a zone through which a territorial or maritime border runs, separating two sovereign States or a state and a marine zone which is beyond the limits of national jurisdiction. Neighbouring states have access to the same reservoir and any activities by one state would have an impact on the position of the other to exploit the same. This paper analyses different frameworks adopted by states to exploit shared offshore reservoirs. It discusses the challenges posed by exploitation of such deposits and the status of international law, specifically on the obligation to cooperate. Further it focuses on state practice and how different concepts in the cycle of hydrocarbon exploitation have been tackled; from discovery to cessation. This paper shall use examples of Norway-UK, USA-Mexico, Australia-Timor-Leste, and Nigeria Sao Tome, Principe arrangements.","PeriodicalId":343955,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Oil (Topic)","volume":"91 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Oil (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2486488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Under international law, state's territorial sovereignty ends at its boundaries and any hydrocarbons reservoirs that straddle across would belong to a different state with control over such territory. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) provides a legal framework for maritime boundary delimitation. However, it does not entirely solve the equation in regard to exploitation of cross-border hydrocarbons. What happens when the hydrocarbon cross boundaries of different states? It may be difficult to determine the quantity of hydrocarbons due to one state. Szekely defines trans boundary natural resources as those situated in a zone through which a territorial or maritime border runs, separating two sovereign States or a state and a marine zone which is beyond the limits of national jurisdiction. Neighbouring states have access to the same reservoir and any activities by one state would have an impact on the position of the other to exploit the same. This paper analyses different frameworks adopted by states to exploit shared offshore reservoirs. It discusses the challenges posed by exploitation of such deposits and the status of international law, specifically on the obligation to cooperate. Further it focuses on state practice and how different concepts in the cycle of hydrocarbon exploitation have been tackled; from discovery to cessation. This paper shall use examples of Norway-UK, USA-Mexico, Australia-Timor-Leste, and Nigeria Sao Tome, Principe arrangements.
海上跨界油气藏开发研究国际法视角
根据国际法,一个国家的领土主权止于其边界,任何跨界的油气储层都将属于控制该领土的另一个国家。《联合国海洋法公约》为海洋划界提供了法律框架。然而,它并没有完全解决跨境碳氢化合物开采方面的问题。当碳氢化合物跨越不同状态的边界时会发生什么?由于一种状态,可能很难确定碳氢化合物的数量。Szekely将跨界自然资源定义为位于领土或海洋边界所经过的区域内的资源,该区域将两个主权国家或一个国家与超出国家管辖范围的海洋区域隔开。邻近的国家可以进入同一水库,一个国家的任何活动都会对另一个国家开采同一水库的立场产生影响。本文分析了各国开发近海共享储层所采用的不同框架。它讨论了开采这种矿藏所构成的挑战和国际法的地位,特别是关于合作义务的地位。此外,它侧重于国家实践以及如何解决碳氢化合物开采周期中的不同概念;从发现到停止。本文将使用挪威-英国,美国-墨西哥,澳大利亚-东帝汶和尼日利亚圣多美,普林西比安排的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信