Performance Evaluation: Two Flood-Cancellation Methods of the Blocking Expanding Ring Searches on the AODV/WiFi MANET Environment

Kwi-Yil Gwak, Sangwook Park, Joo-Seok Song
{"title":"Performance Evaluation: Two Flood-Cancellation Methods of the Blocking Expanding Ring Searches on the AODV/WiFi MANET Environment","authors":"Kwi-Yil Gwak, Sangwook Park, Joo-Seok Song","doi":"10.23919/ICACT.2019.8702034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blocking Expanding Ring Search(BERS) is the modified scheme of TTL-sequence based ERS(TTL-ERS) to increase the energy efficiency by adding a little latency and decreasing the number of route request packet(RREQ)s which are flooded into network to query the path during the route discovery process for the reactive routing protocol of Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET). Until recently, several variants of BERS have been proposed, and all of them use ‘chase’ packet to stop or cancel the flooding of the RREQ for fulfilled route request. In this paper, we modelled these main variants of BERS, classifying them into Source node Initiated Chase Packet (SICP) type and Reply node Initiated Chase Packet (RICP) type, and analyzed the performance of each scheme installed in AODV protocol over WiFi MANET environment by the NS-3 simulator. The results of this paper show undiscovered aspect, different from the results of mathematical and analytical studies or the results of network simulation performed on the low node density network: the performance value of the BERS series deteriorates dramatically after node density of the network comes high. It means that broadcasting of chase packet as well as broadcasting of RREQ is a large burden on the dense node WiFi network. Notably, this phenomenon is more distinct in the SICP type model (BERS, BERS*, BERS+), and it even leads to greater overhead than TTL-ERS in case of very high node density network. On the other hand, the RICP type models (tBERS, tBERS*, tBERS+), which are improved to start flooding cancellation earlier than SICP, exhibit greater performance improvement than expected in case of higher node density. These results show that, in the BERS series models, flooding cancellation by the broadcasting packet can be another factor of the broadcasting storm, and that the earlier the flooding cancellation, the greater the performance improvement effect than theoretical prediction in the high node density WiFi MANET.","PeriodicalId":226261,"journal":{"name":"2019 21st International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 21st International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/ICACT.2019.8702034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Blocking Expanding Ring Search(BERS) is the modified scheme of TTL-sequence based ERS(TTL-ERS) to increase the energy efficiency by adding a little latency and decreasing the number of route request packet(RREQ)s which are flooded into network to query the path during the route discovery process for the reactive routing protocol of Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET). Until recently, several variants of BERS have been proposed, and all of them use ‘chase’ packet to stop or cancel the flooding of the RREQ for fulfilled route request. In this paper, we modelled these main variants of BERS, classifying them into Source node Initiated Chase Packet (SICP) type and Reply node Initiated Chase Packet (RICP) type, and analyzed the performance of each scheme installed in AODV protocol over WiFi MANET environment by the NS-3 simulator. The results of this paper show undiscovered aspect, different from the results of mathematical and analytical studies or the results of network simulation performed on the low node density network: the performance value of the BERS series deteriorates dramatically after node density of the network comes high. It means that broadcasting of chase packet as well as broadcasting of RREQ is a large burden on the dense node WiFi network. Notably, this phenomenon is more distinct in the SICP type model (BERS, BERS*, BERS+), and it even leads to greater overhead than TTL-ERS in case of very high node density network. On the other hand, the RICP type models (tBERS, tBERS*, tBERS+), which are improved to start flooding cancellation earlier than SICP, exhibit greater performance improvement than expected in case of higher node density. These results show that, in the BERS series models, flooding cancellation by the broadcasting packet can be another factor of the broadcasting storm, and that the earlier the flooding cancellation, the greater the performance improvement effect than theoretical prediction in the high node density WiFi MANET.
性能评价:AODV/WiFi MANET环境下阻断扩展环搜索的两种洪水消除方法
阻塞扩展环搜索(BERS)是移动自组网(MANET)响应式路由协议在基于ttl序列的路由搜索(TTL-ERS)基础上的改进方案,通过增加少量延迟和减少在路由发现过程中涌入网络查询路径的路由请求包(RREQ)的数量来提高能量效率。直到最近,已经提出了几种BERS的变体,它们都使用“追逐”包来阻止或取消RREQ对已完成路由请求的泛滥。在本文中,我们对这些主要的BERS变体进行了建模,将它们分为源节点发起追包(SICP)类型和应答节点发起追包(RICP)类型,并通过NS-3模拟器分析了在WiFi MANET环境下安装在AODV协议中的每种方案的性能。本文的研究结果显示了不同于数学和分析研究的结果或在低节点密度网络上进行网络仿真的结果的未被发现的方面:当网络节点密度变大时,BERS系列的性能值急剧下降。这意味着在密集节点的WiFi网络中,追击包的广播和RREQ的广播是一个很大的负担。值得注意的是,这种现象在SICP类型模型(BERS、BERS*、BERS+)中更为明显,在节点密度非常高的网络情况下,它甚至会导致比TTL-ERS更大的开销。另一方面,改进的RICP类型模型(tBERS, tBERS*, tBERS+)比SICP更早开始洪水抵消,在更高节点密度的情况下表现出比预期更大的性能改进。这些结果表明,在BERS系列模型中,广播包的泛洪抵消可能是广播风暴的另一个因素,并且在高节点密度WiFi MANET中,泛洪抵消越早,性能改善效果比理论预测的更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信