Alternative Media as Counter-Hegemony: A Case study of Konde.co and Magdalene.co

M. G. Yoedtadi, Muhammad Adi Pribadi
{"title":"Alternative Media as Counter-Hegemony: A Case study of Konde.co and Magdalene.co","authors":"M. G. Yoedtadi, Muhammad Adi Pribadi","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.201209.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Alternative media have long been placed as media that provide space for marginalized groups from the mainstream media. When the mainstream media is controlled by an authoritarian political system, alternative media becomes an instrument of communication for opposition groups. Likewise, when the democratic political system which causes the mainstream media to be controlled by media conglomerates, alternative media remains a medium that is free from hegemonic capital power. Alternative media perform counter-hegemony against the mainstream media. Provides a different perspective from information dominance.This article aims to determine the form of counter-hegemony conducted by alternative media. The sample in this study is Konde.co and Magdelene.co. This research uses a qualitative approach with a case study method. Data collection is done by in-depth interviews, observation and literature study. The results showed that Konde.co and Magdalene.co played a role as a counter hegemony against the mainstream media. Both of them criticized how the mainstream media portrayed women from patriarchal ideology. Konde.co and Magdalene.co narratives favor women, always from the point of view of women and always defending women's interests. Unfortunately alternative media often have difficulty in operational funds. It needs to be adjusted in applying anti-business and noncommercial principles so that alternative media can live.","PeriodicalId":346556,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2020)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201209.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Alternative media have long been placed as media that provide space for marginalized groups from the mainstream media. When the mainstream media is controlled by an authoritarian political system, alternative media becomes an instrument of communication for opposition groups. Likewise, when the democratic political system which causes the mainstream media to be controlled by media conglomerates, alternative media remains a medium that is free from hegemonic capital power. Alternative media perform counter-hegemony against the mainstream media. Provides a different perspective from information dominance.This article aims to determine the form of counter-hegemony conducted by alternative media. The sample in this study is Konde.co and Magdelene.co. This research uses a qualitative approach with a case study method. Data collection is done by in-depth interviews, observation and literature study. The results showed that Konde.co and Magdalene.co played a role as a counter hegemony against the mainstream media. Both of them criticized how the mainstream media portrayed women from patriarchal ideology. Konde.co and Magdalene.co narratives favor women, always from the point of view of women and always defending women's interests. Unfortunately alternative media often have difficulty in operational funds. It needs to be adjusted in applying anti-business and noncommercial principles so that alternative media can live.
另类媒体作为反霸权:以孔德为例。和抹大拉。co
长期以来,另类媒体一直被定位为为主流媒体之外的边缘群体提供空间的媒体。当主流媒体被专制政治体制控制时,另类媒体就成为反对派团体的沟通工具。同样,当民主政治制度导致主流媒体被媒体集团控制时,另类媒体仍然是一种不受资本霸权控制的媒体。另类媒体对主流媒体实行反霸权。提供了不同于信息支配的视角。本文旨在确定另类媒体进行反霸权的形式。本研究的样本为孔德。和Magdelene.co。本研究采用个案研究的定性研究方法。数据收集采用深度访谈法、观察法和文献研究法。结果表明,孔德。和抹大拉。Co对主流媒体起到了反霸权的作用。她们都批评了主流媒体如何从男权意识形态中描绘女性。Konde。和抹大拉。所有的叙事都偏袒女性,总是站在女性的角度,总是维护女性的利益。不幸的是,替代媒体在运营资金方面往往存在困难。在运用反商业和非商业原则方面需要进行调整,以使另类媒体得以生存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信