Does It Pay to Live in Big(Ger) Cities? The Role of Agglomeration Benefits, Local Amenities, and Costs of Living

Rudiger Ahrend, Alexander C. Lembcke
{"title":"Does It Pay to Live in Big(Ger) Cities? The Role of Agglomeration Benefits, Local Amenities, and Costs of Living","authors":"Rudiger Ahrend, Alexander C. Lembcke","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2925676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study approaches the question whether it “pays�? to live in big(ger) cities in a three-fold manner: first, it estimates how city size affects worker productivity (agglomeration benefits) in Germany, based on individual-level wage data. Second, it considers whether productivity benefits translate into real gains for workers by taking local price levels into account. Third, it examines the role of amenities in explaining differences in real benefits across cities. The estimated elasticity for agglomeration benefits is around 0.02, implying that comparable workers in Hamburg (3 million residents) are about 6% more productive than in Recklinghausen (150 000). But agglomeration benefits are, on average, offset by higher prices, i.e. city size does not systematically translate into real pecuniary benefits for workers. Amenities, e.g. seaside access, theatres, universities, or “disamenities�?, e.g. air pollution, explain – to a large degree – variation in real pecuniary benefits, i.e. real wages are higher in low-amenity cities.","PeriodicalId":239768,"journal":{"name":"Urban Research eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Research eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2925676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This study approaches the question whether it “pays�? to live in big(ger) cities in a three-fold manner: first, it estimates how city size affects worker productivity (agglomeration benefits) in Germany, based on individual-level wage data. Second, it considers whether productivity benefits translate into real gains for workers by taking local price levels into account. Third, it examines the role of amenities in explaining differences in real benefits across cities. The estimated elasticity for agglomeration benefits is around 0.02, implying that comparable workers in Hamburg (3 million residents) are about 6% more productive than in Recklinghausen (150 000). But agglomeration benefits are, on average, offset by higher prices, i.e. city size does not systematically translate into real pecuniary benefits for workers. Amenities, e.g. seaside access, theatres, universities, or “disamenities�?, e.g. air pollution, explain – to a large degree – variation in real pecuniary benefits, i.e. real wages are higher in low-amenity cities.
住在大城市值得吗?集聚效益、当地便利设施和生活成本的作用
这项研究探讨了它是否“有回报”的问题。以三方面的方式在大城市生活:首先,它根据个人层面的工资数据,估计城市规模如何影响德国工人的生产率(集聚效益)。其次,通过考虑当地的物价水平,它考虑了生产率的提高是否转化为工人的实际收益。第三,它考察了便利设施在解释城市之间实际效益差异方面的作用。集聚效益的估计弹性约为0.02,这意味着汉堡(300万居民)的可比工人的生产率比雷克林豪森(15万居民)高6%左右。但平均而言,集聚效益被更高的价格所抵消,即城市规模并不能系统地转化为工人的实际经济效益。便利设施,例如海边、剧院、大学,还是“不便利设施”?,例如空气污染,在很大程度上解释了实际经济效益的差异,即低舒适度城市的实际工资较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信