Contextualized Writing: Promoting Audience-Centered Writing through Scenario Based Learning

P. Golden
{"title":"Contextualized Writing: Promoting Audience-Centered Writing through Scenario Based Learning","authors":"P. Golden","doi":"10.20429/IJSOTL.2018.120106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance stimulates passion and perseverance. Students who believe the course material is relevant to their lives will pay attention, be intrinsically motivated, and begin to see the transferability and application of content skills to other disciplines. Content skills refer to the knowledge, threshold concepts, and attitudes required to succeed in a specific discipline. Relevance of content skills increases student success. While the professor as disciplinary expert readily sees the importance of the subject matter and skill set, students do not always grasp how the class’ intended learning outcomes will benefit them after course completion, especially in the General Education courses, courses that provide a foundation for a student’s academic career. The responsibility of meaning-making is in the hands of the students. No amount of teacher-centered instruction will give that epiphany to the students, rather students must recognize the connections themselves. Student-centered learning approaches involving such active learning techniques as problem-based learning, inquiry-based learning, and case-based learning place the meaning-making in the hands of the student and have thus become the preferred approach within such fields as medical, legal, and military studies. These learning techniques utilize hypothetical but realistic scenarios to encourage students to explore the subject in context of a real-world situation. Rarely are such strategies seen in General Education (Gen Ed) courses, however. An assignment involving a realistic or authentic situation that a practitioner in the field is likely to face in the workplace makes sense as a teaching tool to a pre-med student, but not as obvious a tool for students in Gen Ed courses. Given the customization opportunities of these assignments and the breadth of skills honed during the activity process, the inclusion of such techniques could benefit students taking Gen Ed courses. Given the success of this study, which was to determine the effectiveness of using authentic projects to master the course’s intended learning outcomes, the purpose of this article is to promote the use of authentic projects in General Education courses.","PeriodicalId":332019,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20429/IJSOTL.2018.120106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Relevance stimulates passion and perseverance. Students who believe the course material is relevant to their lives will pay attention, be intrinsically motivated, and begin to see the transferability and application of content skills to other disciplines. Content skills refer to the knowledge, threshold concepts, and attitudes required to succeed in a specific discipline. Relevance of content skills increases student success. While the professor as disciplinary expert readily sees the importance of the subject matter and skill set, students do not always grasp how the class’ intended learning outcomes will benefit them after course completion, especially in the General Education courses, courses that provide a foundation for a student’s academic career. The responsibility of meaning-making is in the hands of the students. No amount of teacher-centered instruction will give that epiphany to the students, rather students must recognize the connections themselves. Student-centered learning approaches involving such active learning techniques as problem-based learning, inquiry-based learning, and case-based learning place the meaning-making in the hands of the student and have thus become the preferred approach within such fields as medical, legal, and military studies. These learning techniques utilize hypothetical but realistic scenarios to encourage students to explore the subject in context of a real-world situation. Rarely are such strategies seen in General Education (Gen Ed) courses, however. An assignment involving a realistic or authentic situation that a practitioner in the field is likely to face in the workplace makes sense as a teaching tool to a pre-med student, but not as obvious a tool for students in Gen Ed courses. Given the customization opportunities of these assignments and the breadth of skills honed during the activity process, the inclusion of such techniques could benefit students taking Gen Ed courses. Given the success of this study, which was to determine the effectiveness of using authentic projects to master the course’s intended learning outcomes, the purpose of this article is to promote the use of authentic projects in General Education courses.
情境化写作:通过情境化学习促进以读者为中心的写作
相关性激发激情和毅力。那些相信课程材料与他们的生活相关的学生会集中注意力,有内在的动力,并开始看到内容技能在其他学科的可转移性和应用。内容技能是指在某一特定领域取得成功所需的知识、阈值概念和态度。内容技能的相关性提高了学生的成功。虽然作为学科专家的教授很容易看到主题和技能的重要性,但学生并不总是掌握课程完成后课程预期的学习成果将如何使他们受益,特别是在通识教育课程中,这些课程为学生的学术生涯奠定了基础。意义建构的责任在学生手中。再多的以教师为中心的教学也不能让学生顿悟,相反,学生必须自己认识到这些联系。以学生为中心的学习方法包括主动学习技术,如基于问题的学习、基于探究的学习和基于案例的学习,将意义创造交给学生,因此已成为医学、法律和军事研究等领域的首选方法。这些学习技巧利用假设但现实的场景来鼓励学生在现实世界的情境中探索主题。然而,这种策略很少出现在通识教育(Gen Ed)课程中。对于医学预科生来说,一项涉及该领域从业者可能在工作场所面临的现实或真实情况的作业作为一种教学工具是有意义的,但对于普通教育课程的学生来说,这种工具就不那么明显了。考虑到这些作业的定制机会以及在活动过程中磨练的技能广度,将这些技术纳入到通用教育课程中可能会使学生受益。鉴于本研究的成功,即确定使用真实项目来掌握课程预期学习成果的有效性,本文的目的是促进在通识教育课程中使用真实项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信