Urodynamic Analysis of Old-aged Men with Persistent Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms after Medical Treatments.

P. Song, H. Shin
{"title":"Urodynamic Analysis of Old-aged Men with Persistent Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms after Medical Treatments.","authors":"P. Song, H. Shin","doi":"10.5213/JKCS.2009.13.2.108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The cause and pathogenesis of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in elderly men is unclear. We analyzed the clinical and urodynamic findings of elderly patients with LUTS to search for accurate diagnosis and effective treatments. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 154 male patients older than 65 years old with LUTS who underwent urodynamic studies between January 2002 and December 2008. The patients were divided into irritative and obstructive symptom groups according to their chief complaints. The urodynamic findings between two groups were compared. And the prevalence of detrusor dysfunction (either detrusor underactivity; DU or detrusor overactivity; DO) according to age, history of urinary retention, the presence of an indwelling urethral catheter, neurologic disease, or diabetes was estimated. Results: The mean age of men was 70.8±4.5 years. On urodynamics, detrusor dysfunction was detected in 116 (75.4%) of 154 patients. Seventy eight (50.6%) patients showed demonstrable evidence of DU of whom 33 (21.4%) had concomitant DO, while 18 (11.7%) had concomitant bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). BOO and DO was identified in 67 (43.5%) and 71 (46.1%) patients, respectively. The prevalence of was significantly greater in the presence of history of acute urinary retention and an indwelling urethral catheter. Conclusion: One hundred forty one (91.6%) elderly patients with LUTS showed urodynamic abnormalities such DO, DU and BOO. Urodynamic study would play a important role in establishing a correct diagnosis in elderly patients with LUTS and deciding on additional treatments. (J Korean Continence Soc 2009;13:108-15)","PeriodicalId":231333,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Continence Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Continence Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5213/JKCS.2009.13.2.108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The cause and pathogenesis of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in elderly men is unclear. We analyzed the clinical and urodynamic findings of elderly patients with LUTS to search for accurate diagnosis and effective treatments. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 154 male patients older than 65 years old with LUTS who underwent urodynamic studies between January 2002 and December 2008. The patients were divided into irritative and obstructive symptom groups according to their chief complaints. The urodynamic findings between two groups were compared. And the prevalence of detrusor dysfunction (either detrusor underactivity; DU or detrusor overactivity; DO) according to age, history of urinary retention, the presence of an indwelling urethral catheter, neurologic disease, or diabetes was estimated. Results: The mean age of men was 70.8±4.5 years. On urodynamics, detrusor dysfunction was detected in 116 (75.4%) of 154 patients. Seventy eight (50.6%) patients showed demonstrable evidence of DU of whom 33 (21.4%) had concomitant DO, while 18 (11.7%) had concomitant bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). BOO and DO was identified in 67 (43.5%) and 71 (46.1%) patients, respectively. The prevalence of was significantly greater in the presence of history of acute urinary retention and an indwelling urethral catheter. Conclusion: One hundred forty one (91.6%) elderly patients with LUTS showed urodynamic abnormalities such DO, DU and BOO. Urodynamic study would play a important role in establishing a correct diagnosis in elderly patients with LUTS and deciding on additional treatments. (J Korean Continence Soc 2009;13:108-15)
老年男性用药后持续下尿路症状的尿动力学分析
目的:老年男性下尿路症状(LUTS)的病因及发病机制尚不清楚。我们分析老年LUTS患者的临床和尿动力学表现,以寻求准确的诊断和有效的治疗。材料和方法:我们对2002年1月至2008年12月期间接受尿动力学研究的154例65岁以上男性LUTS患者进行了回顾性图表回顾。根据患者的主诉分为刺激症状组和阻塞性症状组。比较两组患者尿动力学结果。以及逼尿肌功能障碍的患病率(要么逼尿肌活动不足;逼尿肌或逼尿肌过度活动;根据年龄、尿潴留史、留置导尿管、神经系统疾病或糖尿病的存在来估计DO。结果:男性平均年龄70.8±4.5岁。尿动力学方面,154例患者中有116例(75.4%)出现逼尿肌功能障碍。78例(50.6%)患者有明显的DU证据,其中33例(21.4%)合并DO, 18例(11.7%)合并膀胱出口梗阻(BOO)。BOO和DO分别为67例(43.5%)和71例(46.1%)。有急性尿潴留病史和留置导尿管者,其患病率显著增高。结论:141例(91.6%)老年LUTS患者存在DO、DU、BOO等尿动力学异常。尿动力学研究对老年LUTS患者的正确诊断和决定后续治疗具有重要意义。(韩国自制学报2009;13:108-15)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信