{"title":"Writings from the Grotesque World: «Julio Jurenito» by Ilya Ehrenburg and «The Naked Year» by Boris Pilnyak","authors":"O. Minaeva","doi":"10.35785/2072-9464-2021-56-4-39-47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article we focus on grotesque nature of Ilya Ehrenburg’s and Boris \nPilnyak’s creative prose, viz. «Julio Jurenito» and «The Naked Year». These nov- \nels were written almost at the same time. They share commonality in issues and \nstyle. We compare these novels to trace how the both writers use grotesques in \ntheir works about Russian Revolution. \nDespite both Ehrenburg and Pilnyak sharing one technique, they realize \nit in a quite different manner. Ilya Ehrenburg finds grotesque in every human \nbeing. Thus, the world, where people live, act and communicate, can be nothing \nmore but an inevitable and everlasting carnival where everybody takes part, will- \ningly or unwillingly but without any chance for escape. A solid, «classic» world \nis just a mirage. \nOn the contrary, Pilnyak casts his protagonists into a world with clear \ndistinctions – physical, territorial, moral, etc. For some period of time, chaos does \noverride cosmos, forcing protagonists to find themselves in the middle of a very \ngrotesque situation. However, the prevalence of grotesque is somewhat transi- \ntional while the cosmos is perennial. \nWriters with a modernist background typically use grotesque when they \nset their plot in the age of Russian Revolution. But at the same time, there is an \nessential junction when they recognize grotesque in a human personality or in \nsituations how people live and act.","PeriodicalId":211127,"journal":{"name":"Izvestia of Smolensk State University","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestia of Smolensk State University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35785/2072-9464-2021-56-4-39-47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the article we focus on grotesque nature of Ilya Ehrenburg’s and Boris
Pilnyak’s creative prose, viz. «Julio Jurenito» and «The Naked Year». These nov-
els were written almost at the same time. They share commonality in issues and
style. We compare these novels to trace how the both writers use grotesques in
their works about Russian Revolution.
Despite both Ehrenburg and Pilnyak sharing one technique, they realize
it in a quite different manner. Ilya Ehrenburg finds grotesque in every human
being. Thus, the world, where people live, act and communicate, can be nothing
more but an inevitable and everlasting carnival where everybody takes part, will-
ingly or unwillingly but without any chance for escape. A solid, «classic» world
is just a mirage.
On the contrary, Pilnyak casts his protagonists into a world with clear
distinctions – physical, territorial, moral, etc. For some period of time, chaos does
override cosmos, forcing protagonists to find themselves in the middle of a very
grotesque situation. However, the prevalence of grotesque is somewhat transi-
tional while the cosmos is perennial.
Writers with a modernist background typically use grotesque when they
set their plot in the age of Russian Revolution. But at the same time, there is an
essential junction when they recognize grotesque in a human personality or in
situations how people live and act.