Detecting Errors in Cognitive Models Using Visualization Metaphors of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps

R. Isaev, A. Podvesovskii
{"title":"Detecting Errors in Cognitive Models Using Visualization Metaphors of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps","authors":"R. Isaev, A. Podvesovskii","doi":"10.51130/graphicon-2020-2-4-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Verification of cognitive models is one of the most important stages in their construction, since reliability of results of subsequent modeling largely depends on the successful implementation of verification. The paper considers the problem of verifying cause-and-effect relationships in cognitive models based on the use of fuzzy cognitive maps. It is noted that increasing the effectiveness of cognitive model verification is possible by activating analyst's cognitive potential. The most natural way of such activation is to increase cognitive clarity of the model through the use of visualization capabilities. For this purpose, a number of metaphors for visualizing fuzzy cognitive maps have been proposed, aimed at increasing their cognitive clarity during verification. Each of the metaphors is focused on the visualization of a certain type of fragments of a fuzzy cognitive map potentially containing errors, redundancy or incompleteness and therefore of interest from the point of view of verification. The first considered visualization metaphor is intended to display the cycles that are part of a cognitive graph. The second metaphor focuses on the mapping of transitive paths between concepts. Finally, the third metaphor is aimed at eliminating cognitive model incompleteness, which consists in the lack of relationships between some concepts. Examples are given of applying the proposed visualization metaphors to increase cognitive clarity of the visual image of the verified fuzzy cognitive map.","PeriodicalId":344054,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Computer Graphics and Machine Vision (GraphiCon 2020). Part 2","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Computer Graphics and Machine Vision (GraphiCon 2020). Part 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51130/graphicon-2020-2-4-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Verification of cognitive models is one of the most important stages in their construction, since reliability of results of subsequent modeling largely depends on the successful implementation of verification. The paper considers the problem of verifying cause-and-effect relationships in cognitive models based on the use of fuzzy cognitive maps. It is noted that increasing the effectiveness of cognitive model verification is possible by activating analyst's cognitive potential. The most natural way of such activation is to increase cognitive clarity of the model through the use of visualization capabilities. For this purpose, a number of metaphors for visualizing fuzzy cognitive maps have been proposed, aimed at increasing their cognitive clarity during verification. Each of the metaphors is focused on the visualization of a certain type of fragments of a fuzzy cognitive map potentially containing errors, redundancy or incompleteness and therefore of interest from the point of view of verification. The first considered visualization metaphor is intended to display the cycles that are part of a cognitive graph. The second metaphor focuses on the mapping of transitive paths between concepts. Finally, the third metaphor is aimed at eliminating cognitive model incompleteness, which consists in the lack of relationships between some concepts. Examples are given of applying the proposed visualization metaphors to increase cognitive clarity of the visual image of the verified fuzzy cognitive map.
利用模糊认知地图的可视化隐喻检测认知模型中的错误
认知模型的验证是其构建过程中最重要的阶段之一,因为后续建模结果的可靠性在很大程度上取决于验证的成功实施。本文研究了基于模糊认知图的认知模型中因果关系的验证问题。值得注意的是,通过激活分析师的认知潜能,可以提高认知模型验证的有效性。这种激活最自然的方式是通过使用可视化功能来增加模型的认知清晰度。为此,已经提出了一些可视化模糊认知地图的隐喻,旨在提高其在验证过程中的认知清晰度。每个隐喻都集中在模糊认知地图的某种类型的片段的可视化上,这些片段可能包含错误、冗余或不完整,因此从验证的角度来看是有趣的。第一个考虑的可视化隐喻旨在显示作为认知图一部分的周期。第二个比喻侧重于概念之间传递路径的映射。最后,第三个隐喻旨在消除认知模型的不完全性,即某些概念之间缺乏关系。给出了应用所提出的可视化隐喻来提高已验证的模糊认知地图视觉图像的认知清晰度的实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信