Individuals and times in the problems of contemporary philosophy of language

P. Kusliy
{"title":"Individuals and times in the problems of contemporary philosophy of language","authors":"P. Kusliy","doi":"10.21146/2413-9084-2022-27-1-130-148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article provides an overview of the latest research in the field of the semantics of tense and specifically the ways of representing the temporal dimension of meaning in natural lan­guage. The paper also outlines the content of classical studies, the problems of which are discussed in the more recent literature. It is shown that with the development of research in the field of semantics of temporal morphemes and quantifier expressions, the relationship between language and time began to acquire more and more parallels with the relationship between language and individual objects. This statement is illustrated with a number of ex­amples. In particular, the difference between the quantificational and the pronominal inter­pretation of temporal morphemes. Parallels in the semantics of temporal morphemes and referential expressions are also revealed in propositional attitude reports, where similar problems arise (both in connection with de se and de re reports). Thus, it is shown that, like the morphology of personal pronouns, the temporal morphology can be interpreted or unin­terpreted in similar circumstances. It is also shown that the semantics of temporal mor­phemes is in some cases even more sensitive to linguistic aspects and the context of use than that of personal pronouns. This is illustrated with the existing restrictions on the temporal in­terpretation of attitude reports that have no analogues in the sphere of pointing to individual objects. The problems of connection of the temporal interpretation of linguistic expressions with the semantics of the verb form, modal verbs and negation are also addressed. It is shown how exactly these aspects of the semantics of tense significantly enrich the philo­sophical understanding of the triad “language – reality – subject”.","PeriodicalId":227944,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Science and Technology","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2413-9084-2022-27-1-130-148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article provides an overview of the latest research in the field of the semantics of tense and specifically the ways of representing the temporal dimension of meaning in natural lan­guage. The paper also outlines the content of classical studies, the problems of which are discussed in the more recent literature. It is shown that with the development of research in the field of semantics of temporal morphemes and quantifier expressions, the relationship between language and time began to acquire more and more parallels with the relationship between language and individual objects. This statement is illustrated with a number of ex­amples. In particular, the difference between the quantificational and the pronominal inter­pretation of temporal morphemes. Parallels in the semantics of temporal morphemes and referential expressions are also revealed in propositional attitude reports, where similar problems arise (both in connection with de se and de re reports). Thus, it is shown that, like the morphology of personal pronouns, the temporal morphology can be interpreted or unin­terpreted in similar circumstances. It is also shown that the semantics of temporal mor­phemes is in some cases even more sensitive to linguistic aspects and the context of use than that of personal pronouns. This is illustrated with the existing restrictions on the temporal in­terpretation of attitude reports that have no analogues in the sphere of pointing to individual objects. The problems of connection of the temporal interpretation of linguistic expressions with the semantics of the verb form, modal verbs and negation are also addressed. It is shown how exactly these aspects of the semantics of tense significantly enrich the philo­sophical understanding of the triad “language – reality – subject”.
当代语言哲学中的个体与时代问题
本文综述了时态语义研究的最新进展,特别是时态语义在自然语言中的时间维度表征方法。本文还概述了古典研究的内容,这些问题在最近的文献中得到了讨论。研究表明,随着时间语素和量词语义研究的深入,语言与时间的关系开始越来越接近于语言与个体客体的关系。这个说法是用一些例子来说明的。特别是时间语素的量词解释和代词解释的区别。在命题态度报告中,时间语素和指称表达在语义上也有相似之处,出现了类似的问题(既与“是”有关,也与“是”有关)。因此,研究表明,与人称代词的形态一样,时间形态在类似的情况下可以被解释或不被解释。在某些情况下,语素的语义甚至比人称代词对语言方面和使用语境更为敏感。这可以用现有的对态度报告的时间解释的限制来说明,在指向单个对象的领域中没有类似的东西。语言表达的时间解释与动词形式、情态动词和否定的语义之间的联系问题也得到了解决。本文揭示了时态语义学的这些方面如何极大地丰富了对“语言-现实-主体”三位一体的哲学理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信