The Effect of Peer Instruction on Conceptual and Operational Approaches Preferred in Problem Solutions

Avni Yildiz, Yusuf Ziya Olpak, Serdal Baltaci
{"title":"The Effect of Peer Instruction on Conceptual and Operational Approaches Preferred in Problem Solutions","authors":"Avni Yildiz, Yusuf Ziya Olpak, Serdal Baltaci","doi":"10.36941/jicd-2019-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The level of using conceptual and operational knowledge is of great importance in the problem-solving process. The previous studies on the measurement of conceptual and operational knowledge, have been, especially examining the problem solutions or in discussing the views. On the other hand, rich learning environments should be established to overcome such difficulties in teaching mathematics in general and analytical geometry in particular. In this study, the researchers provide useful information to the literature since this study aimed to examine quantitatively, whether the peer instruction in analytic geometry has any effect on the conceptual and operational approaches of secondary school mathematics teacher candidates in problem solving. The sample of the research is composed of (including 22 females, and 1 males) secondary school mathematics teacher candidates. Considering the advantages of technological resources on learning, the learning management system (LMS) designed by the second author, was used during the question-answer process. Before the application, the course content was integrated into the online learning management system (LMS). The teacher candidates were divided into groups before the application. In this research, the first group will be presented in the context of the research problem. In the first group, the scores of the prospective teachers who wanted to use the second right to answer were not reduced. Conceptual & Operational Approach towards Problem-Solving scale, developed by Özyıldırım Gümüş and Umay (2018) was used as the data collection tool. One of the two options is conceptual and the other one is the operational. Thus, it is possible to decide on approaches from the responses. Since the value of this approach could be related with the data set, the cut-off point was determined by the ROC curve method in SPSS program and the data were analyzed descriptively by the reference to this cut-off point. It has been determined that the secondary school mathematics teacher candidates display a conceptual knowledge-based approach through peer instruction.","PeriodicalId":302999,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Cooperation and Development","volume":"2476 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Cooperation and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36941/jicd-2019-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The level of using conceptual and operational knowledge is of great importance in the problem-solving process. The previous studies on the measurement of conceptual and operational knowledge, have been, especially examining the problem solutions or in discussing the views. On the other hand, rich learning environments should be established to overcome such difficulties in teaching mathematics in general and analytical geometry in particular. In this study, the researchers provide useful information to the literature since this study aimed to examine quantitatively, whether the peer instruction in analytic geometry has any effect on the conceptual and operational approaches of secondary school mathematics teacher candidates in problem solving. The sample of the research is composed of (including 22 females, and 1 males) secondary school mathematics teacher candidates. Considering the advantages of technological resources on learning, the learning management system (LMS) designed by the second author, was used during the question-answer process. Before the application, the course content was integrated into the online learning management system (LMS). The teacher candidates were divided into groups before the application. In this research, the first group will be presented in the context of the research problem. In the first group, the scores of the prospective teachers who wanted to use the second right to answer were not reduced. Conceptual & Operational Approach towards Problem-Solving scale, developed by Özyıldırım Gümüş and Umay (2018) was used as the data collection tool. One of the two options is conceptual and the other one is the operational. Thus, it is possible to decide on approaches from the responses. Since the value of this approach could be related with the data set, the cut-off point was determined by the ROC curve method in SPSS program and the data were analyzed descriptively by the reference to this cut-off point. It has been determined that the secondary school mathematics teacher candidates display a conceptual knowledge-based approach through peer instruction.
同伴指导对问题解决中首选的概念和操作方法的影响
在解决问题的过程中,使用概念和操作知识的水平是非常重要的。以往关于概念性和操作性知识测量的研究,主要集中在考察问题的解决方案或讨论观点。另一方面,要克服一般数学,特别是解析几何教学中的困难,必须建立丰富的学习环境。在本研究中,研究者为文献提供了有用的信息,因为本研究旨在定量地考察解析几何的同伴指导是否对中学数学教师候选人在解决问题时的概念和操作方法有任何影响。本研究样本由中学数学教师候选人(女22人,男1人)组成。考虑到技术资源对学习的优势,在问答过程中使用了第二作者设计的学习管理系统(LMS)。在申请之前,课程内容被整合到在线学习管理系统(LMS)中。教师候选人在申请前被分成小组。在本研究中,第一组将在研究问题的背景下提出。在第一组中,想要使用第二个权利回答的未来教师的分数没有减少。由Özyıldırım g m和Umay(2018)开发的解决问题规模的概念和操作方法被用作数据收集工具。两个选择之一是概念性的,另一个是操作性的。因此,有可能从响应中决定方法。由于该方法的值可能与数据集相关,因此采用SPSS程序中的ROC曲线法确定分界点,并参照该分界点对数据进行描述性分析。通过同伴指导,中学数学教师候选人表现出概念知识为基础的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信