Male or Female, who is better? Student's Perception of the E-Module in Physics-Mathematics Vector Material

A. Astalini, D. Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan*, Auliya Ramadhanti
{"title":"Male or Female, who is better? Student's Perception of the E-Module in Physics-Mathematics Vector Material","authors":"A. Astalini, D. Darmaji, D. A. Kurniawan*, Auliya Ramadhanti","doi":"10.30998/formatif.v12i1.10264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to see how students from different classes perceive the e-Module Mathematics Physics I on vector material, besides that variations in gender differences will also be tested in this perception. The type of research used is descriptive quantitative research. The population in this study were students of Physics Education class 2019 with a sample of 80 students in regular classes A and C. The data were analyzed descriptively and inferentially by using the IBM SPSS Statistic 22 application which consisted of descriptive test, normality test, homogeneity test, and t-test analysis. The results obtained are normal data with a sig of 0.190, and homogeneous with a sig of 0.305. While the t-test obtained a sig value of 0.019 for gender differences in class A, and 0.017 for gender differences in class C. So Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, meaning that there are significant (significant) differences in perceptions based on gender in each class A and C. Where the perception of male students is higher than the perception of female students, but overall students give a good perception of the Mathematics Physics e-module I on Vector material.","PeriodicalId":123598,"journal":{"name":"Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v12i1.10264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to see how students from different classes perceive the e-Module Mathematics Physics I on vector material, besides that variations in gender differences will also be tested in this perception. The type of research used is descriptive quantitative research. The population in this study were students of Physics Education class 2019 with a sample of 80 students in regular classes A and C. The data were analyzed descriptively and inferentially by using the IBM SPSS Statistic 22 application which consisted of descriptive test, normality test, homogeneity test, and t-test analysis. The results obtained are normal data with a sig of 0.190, and homogeneous with a sig of 0.305. While the t-test obtained a sig value of 0.019 for gender differences in class A, and 0.017 for gender differences in class C. So Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, meaning that there are significant (significant) differences in perceptions based on gender in each class A and C. Where the perception of male students is higher than the perception of female students, but overall students give a good perception of the Mathematics Physics e-module I on Vector material.
男性和女性,谁更好?学生对物理数学矢量材料中e模块的认知
本研究旨在了解不同班级的学生如何感知矢量材料上的e-Module数学物理I,除此之外,性别差异的变化也将在这种感知中进行测试。所使用的研究类型是描述性定量研究。本研究的总体为物理教育2019级学生,样本为普通a班和c班80名学生。数据采用IBM SPSS Statistic 22应用程序进行描述性和推理分析,包括描述性检验、正态性检验、齐性检验和t检验分析。所得结果为正态数据,sig为0.190,均匀性数据,sig为0.305。而a班性别差异的t检验的sig值为0.019,c班性别差异的sig值为0.017,因此Ho被拒绝,Ha被接受,这意味着a班和c班基于性别的感知存在显著(significant)差异。其中男生的感知高于女生的感知,但总体上学生对Vector material上的数学物理电子模块I的感知较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信