Easy-to-Read enables Participatory Social Research

Gabriele Trautendorfer, Birgit Peböck, F. Pühretmair, Myriam Karlinger
{"title":"Easy-to-Read enables Participatory Social Research","authors":"Gabriele Trautendorfer, Birgit Peböck, F. Pühretmair, Myriam Karlinger","doi":"10.1145/3019943.3019972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Participation requires decision-making power. Decision-making power requires understanding. Understanding requires accessible information. Easy-to-Read can help to make information accessible for a wide range of target groups, especially for people with cognitive disabilities. The goal of Participatory Research is to maximize the participation of those whose life or work is the subject of the research. This paper follows the understanding of Participatory Research as a research paradigm claimed by the International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR). To make participation of people who are belonging to a certain target group at all possible, comprehensive information has to be accessible for all members of the research group. Participation in this sense means to give decision-making authority to the target group [1]. Decision making authority requires understanding and knowledge about the research issue, the process, and transparent distribution of competences in the first place. Responsible decisions can only be made with enough knowledge about the possible impacts of the decision. Participatory social research with people with cognitive disabilities means to qualify them to influence the research process and make decisions on well-informed and equal bases. A key factor in this process is Easy-to-Read information. The main objective of Easy-to-Read and the \"capito\"-network is to make information accessible for a defined target group [2]. The \"capito\"-method therefore developed a set of criteria, a quality standard and a protected seal of quality, which is only given when the text is reviewed by representatives of the target group. This paper discusses how Easy-to-Read can enable Participatory Research by empowering co-researchers with non-scientific background by providing accessible information. It shows an example of a participatory research group that consists of people with cognitive disabilities and social scientists. Frame conditions, used methods and challenges in practice are described in this paper.","PeriodicalId":334897,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3019943.3019972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Participation requires decision-making power. Decision-making power requires understanding. Understanding requires accessible information. Easy-to-Read can help to make information accessible for a wide range of target groups, especially for people with cognitive disabilities. The goal of Participatory Research is to maximize the participation of those whose life or work is the subject of the research. This paper follows the understanding of Participatory Research as a research paradigm claimed by the International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR). To make participation of people who are belonging to a certain target group at all possible, comprehensive information has to be accessible for all members of the research group. Participation in this sense means to give decision-making authority to the target group [1]. Decision making authority requires understanding and knowledge about the research issue, the process, and transparent distribution of competences in the first place. Responsible decisions can only be made with enough knowledge about the possible impacts of the decision. Participatory social research with people with cognitive disabilities means to qualify them to influence the research process and make decisions on well-informed and equal bases. A key factor in this process is Easy-to-Read information. The main objective of Easy-to-Read and the "capito"-network is to make information accessible for a defined target group [2]. The "capito"-method therefore developed a set of criteria, a quality standard and a protected seal of quality, which is only given when the text is reviewed by representatives of the target group. This paper discusses how Easy-to-Read can enable Participatory Research by empowering co-researchers with non-scientific background by providing accessible information. It shows an example of a participatory research group that consists of people with cognitive disabilities and social scientists. Frame conditions, used methods and challenges in practice are described in this paper.
易于阅读使参与式社会研究
参与需要决策权。决策权需要理解。理解需要可获取的信息。“易读”有助于使广泛的目标群体,特别是有认知障碍的人能够获得信息。参与式研究的目标是使研究对象的生活或工作的参与最大化。本文遵循参与式研究作为参与式健康研究国际合作(ICPHR)所主张的一种研究范式的理解。为了使属于某一目标群体的人尽可能参与,必须使研究小组的所有成员都能获得全面的信息。从这个意义上说,参与意味着赋予目标群体决策权。决策权威首先需要理解和了解研究问题、过程和透明的权力分配。只有在充分了解决策可能产生的影响后,才能做出负责任的决策。对认知障碍者进行参与性社会研究意味着使他们有资格影响研究过程,并在知情和平等的基础上作出决定。这个过程中的一个关键因素是易于阅读的信息。“易读”和“资本化”网络的主要目标是使一个确定的目标群体能够获得信息。因此,“capito”方法制订了一套标准、一项质量标准和一种受保护的质量印章,只有在目标群体的代表审查文本时才给予这种印章。本文讨论了easy - read如何通过提供可访问的信息来授权具有非科学背景的共同研究人员,从而使参与式研究成为可能。它展示了一个由认知障碍患者和社会科学家组成的参与性研究小组的例子。本文介绍了框架条件、采用的方法和实践中面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信