Reducing of Waste in Filling Processes A Case Study of Medicinal Products for Human Factory

Mahrlisa Magumhin, Weerakarj Dokchan
{"title":"Reducing of Waste in Filling Processes A Case Study of Medicinal Products for Human Factory","authors":"Mahrlisa Magumhin, Weerakarj Dokchan","doi":"10.14416/j.ted.2022.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purposes of this study were to : 1) reduce the quantity of waste caused by errors in filling processes and 2) improve the quality in filling processes of ready-made medicines in the factory as a case of study by applying the operational approach of Six Sigma projects, including Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control (DMAIC) for five steps. First, the methods started from “Define” step by studying waste problem which occurred from errors of filling processes, defining the goal, setting scope of modification and building a team for brainstorming. Second, problem condition was measured in “Measure” step by collecting data about waste sorting. Third, “Analyze” step was brainstorming the causes of waste to make cause and effect diagram, coupled with analyzing Failure Mode and Effect Analyze process (FMEA) by estimating the severity of effect, the probabilities of effect and therefore the ability of error identification. Then Risk Priority Number was calculated to reduce score to less than 100. Fourth, “Improve” step was performed by adding examination process into filling processes and training how to work properly. Finally, “Control” step was performed by creating waste database as the history for solving problems in the future, making documents about controlling filling processes to make filling have the highest efficiency and comparing waste data before and after modification. The results of this study indicated that: 1) the quantity of waste occurrence was reduced from 71 boxes (0.033 percentage) to 2 boxes (0.002 percentage) moreover average quantity of waste was reduced from 6 boxes per month to 1 box per 3 months and 2) value of waste after filling-processes modification of ready-made medicines in the factory was reduced to 93.662 percentage.","PeriodicalId":120890,"journal":{"name":"Journal Of Technical Education Development","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Of Technical Education Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14416/j.ted.2022.08.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to : 1) reduce the quantity of waste caused by errors in filling processes and 2) improve the quality in filling processes of ready-made medicines in the factory as a case of study by applying the operational approach of Six Sigma projects, including Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control (DMAIC) for five steps. First, the methods started from “Define” step by studying waste problem which occurred from errors of filling processes, defining the goal, setting scope of modification and building a team for brainstorming. Second, problem condition was measured in “Measure” step by collecting data about waste sorting. Third, “Analyze” step was brainstorming the causes of waste to make cause and effect diagram, coupled with analyzing Failure Mode and Effect Analyze process (FMEA) by estimating the severity of effect, the probabilities of effect and therefore the ability of error identification. Then Risk Priority Number was calculated to reduce score to less than 100. Fourth, “Improve” step was performed by adding examination process into filling processes and training how to work properly. Finally, “Control” step was performed by creating waste database as the history for solving problems in the future, making documents about controlling filling processes to make filling have the highest efficiency and comparing waste data before and after modification. The results of this study indicated that: 1) the quantity of waste occurrence was reduced from 71 boxes (0.033 percentage) to 2 boxes (0.002 percentage) moreover average quantity of waste was reduced from 6 boxes per month to 1 box per 3 months and 2) value of waste after filling-processes modification of ready-made medicines in the factory was reduced to 93.662 percentage.
减少灌装过程中的浪费——以人为工厂的药品为例
本研究的目的是:1)减少灌装过程中错误造成的浪费数量;2)以工厂为例,应用六西格玛项目的运作方法,包括定义、测量、分析、改进和控制(DMAIC)五个步骤,提高工厂成品药灌装过程的质量。首先,方法从“Define”步骤开始,研究灌装工艺错误导致的浪费问题,确定目标,设定修改范围,组建团队进行头脑风暴。其次,通过收集垃圾分类数据,在“测量”步骤测量问题条件。第三,“分析”步骤是对造成浪费的原因进行头脑风暴,制作因果关系图,并通过估计影响的严重程度、影响的概率以及错误识别的能力来分析失效模式和影响分析过程(FMEA)。然后计算风险优先级数,使得分降至100以下。第四步是“改进”,在灌装过程中加入检查流程,培训如何正确工作。最后是“控制”步骤,创建废弃物数据库作为未来解决问题的历史记录,制作控制灌装工艺的文档,使灌装效率达到最高,对比修改前后的废弃物数据。研究结果表明:1)废品量从71箱(0.033 %)减少到2箱(0.002 %),平均废品量从6箱/月减少到1箱/月;2)工厂对成品药进行灌装工艺改性后的废品量减少到93.662%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信