The Implementation of Non-Refoulement Principle in Case of Rohingnya

Mumpuni Tri Utami
{"title":"The Implementation of Non-Refoulement Principle in Case of Rohingnya","authors":"Mumpuni Tri Utami","doi":"10.15294/digest.v1i2.48629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The principle of non-refoulement is a refugee protection framework that prohibits the recipient country to expel the individual concerned to the area where he will experience persecution. Along with developments in international human rights law, the principle of non-refoulement is used as a method of fulfilling and protecting rights that are not interrogated, one of which is the right to be free from torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading behavior. This makes the principle of non-refoulement often applied without exception and discussed to achieve the status of jus cogen, the highest norm in the international legal hierarchy. The increase in asylum seekers is very worrying for the country of Indonesia, because Indonesia is not one of the countries ratifying the 1951 Refugee Convention, and has no obligation to accept asylum seekers, if asylum seekers enter illegally into Indonesia, and can disrupt the stability of Indonesia's defense and security . In general, the state is not asked to allow foreigners to enter its territory, but refugees are an exception to that rule. Refugees are people who are in a very vulnerable situation. They do not get protection from their own country, even often the government itself threatens to persecute them. In such circumstances, the international community makes the necessary efforts to guarantee and ensure that a person's basic rights remain protected and respected. In this international protection status, a person who is in a capacity as a refugee is obliged to get protection for his basic human rights. Rohingya ethnic refugees without citizenship are one example. Torture and discrimination have made them inevitably leave their home countries for centuries. Many of them fled to countries like Indonesia. However, it should be remembered that Indonesia did not ratify the 1956 convention or the 1967 protocol. However, the existence of the principle of non-refoulement caused Indonesia to accept and protect the Rohingya refugees.","PeriodicalId":141082,"journal":{"name":"The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/digest.v1i2.48629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The principle of non-refoulement is a refugee protection framework that prohibits the recipient country to expel the individual concerned to the area where he will experience persecution. Along with developments in international human rights law, the principle of non-refoulement is used as a method of fulfilling and protecting rights that are not interrogated, one of which is the right to be free from torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading behavior. This makes the principle of non-refoulement often applied without exception and discussed to achieve the status of jus cogen, the highest norm in the international legal hierarchy. The increase in asylum seekers is very worrying for the country of Indonesia, because Indonesia is not one of the countries ratifying the 1951 Refugee Convention, and has no obligation to accept asylum seekers, if asylum seekers enter illegally into Indonesia, and can disrupt the stability of Indonesia's defense and security . In general, the state is not asked to allow foreigners to enter its territory, but refugees are an exception to that rule. Refugees are people who are in a very vulnerable situation. They do not get protection from their own country, even often the government itself threatens to persecute them. In such circumstances, the international community makes the necessary efforts to guarantee and ensure that a person's basic rights remain protected and respected. In this international protection status, a person who is in a capacity as a refugee is obliged to get protection for his basic human rights. Rohingya ethnic refugees without citizenship are one example. Torture and discrimination have made them inevitably leave their home countries for centuries. Many of them fled to countries like Indonesia. However, it should be remembered that Indonesia did not ratify the 1956 convention or the 1967 protocol. However, the existence of the principle of non-refoulement caused Indonesia to accept and protect the Rohingya refugees.
不驱回原则在罗兴亚人案件中的执行
不驱回原则是一种难民保护框架,禁止接受国将有关个人驱逐到他将遭受迫害的地区。随着国际人权法的发展,不驱回原则被用作实现和保护不受讯问的权利的一种方法,其中之一是不受酷刑、残忍、不人道和有辱人格行为的权利。这使得不驱回原则经常毫无例外地得到应用和讨论,以达到强制法的地位,这是国际法律等级制度中的最高规范。寻求庇护者的增加对印度尼西亚来说是非常令人担忧的,因为印度尼西亚不是批准1951年难民公约的国家之一,并且没有义务接受寻求庇护者,如果寻求庇护者非法进入印度尼西亚,并且可能破坏印度尼西亚国防和安全的稳定。一般来说,国家不被要求允许外国人进入其领土,但难民是该规则的例外。难民是指处境非常脆弱的人。他们得不到自己国家的保护,甚至政府经常威胁要迫害他们。在这种情况下,国际社会作出必要的努力,保障和确保一个人的基本权利得到保护和尊重。在这种国际保护地位下,具有难民身份的人有义务保护其基本人权。没有公民身份的罗兴亚族难民就是一个例子。几个世纪以来,酷刑和歧视使他们不可避免地离开了自己的祖国。他们中的许多人逃到了印度尼西亚等国家。但是,应当记住,印度尼西亚没有批准1956年公约或1967年议定书。然而,不驱回原则的存在使得印尼接受并保护了罗兴亚难民。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信